The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Differential use of trails by forest mammals and the implications for camera trap studies, a case study from Belize, Central America

Differential use of trails by forest mammals and the implications for camera trap studies, a case study from Belize, Central America
Differential use of trails by forest mammals and the implications for camera trap studies, a case study from Belize, Central America
Relative abundance indices are often used to compare species abundance between sites. The indices assume that species have similar detection probabilities, or that differences between detection probabilities are known and can be corrected for.

Indices often consist of encounter frequencies of footprints, burrows, markings or photo captures along trails or transect lines, but the assumption of equal detection probabilities is rarely validated. This study analyses detection probabilities of a range of Neotropical mammals on trails in dense secondary forest, using camera-trap and track data.

Photo captures of the two large cats, jaguars (Panthera onca) and pumas (Puma concolor), were correlated solely with trail variables, while photo captures of their potential prey species had no correlation or negative correlation with trail variables.

The Neotropical mammals varied greatly in their tendency to follow or cross trails based on footprints surveys. This indicates that camera locations on trails will have varying detection probability for these Neotropical mammals.

Even the two similar-sized jaguars and pumas, occupying relatively similar niches, differed subtly in their use of trails. Pumas followed trails more completely while jaguars were more likely to deviate from trails. The ecological significance of these findings is that jaguars seem to be more willing to use the forest matrix away from trails than are pumas.

We conclude that trail-based indices, such as photographic captures or tracks along trails, are not appropriate for comparison between Neotropical species, and not even between relatively similar species like jaguars and pumas.
bias, camera trapping, detection probability, jaguars, pumas, relative abundance, trail use
126-133
Harmsen, Bart J.
c84e0703-d49d-4b09-980a-423b09fd5536
Foster, Rebecca J.
842ac52b-bc3d-4d9c-bf81-61b2e4b6964e
Silver, Scott
9ec95392-6231-4cb5-bb86-205392ea08d8
Ostro, Linde
a1caeae8-bd3d-40f0-ad0a-aacd76795278
Doncaster, C. Patrick
0eff2f42-fa0a-4e35-b6ac-475ad3482047
Harmsen, Bart J.
c84e0703-d49d-4b09-980a-423b09fd5536
Foster, Rebecca J.
842ac52b-bc3d-4d9c-bf81-61b2e4b6964e
Silver, Scott
9ec95392-6231-4cb5-bb86-205392ea08d8
Ostro, Linde
a1caeae8-bd3d-40f0-ad0a-aacd76795278
Doncaster, C. Patrick
0eff2f42-fa0a-4e35-b6ac-475ad3482047

Harmsen, Bart J., Foster, Rebecca J., Silver, Scott, Ostro, Linde and Doncaster, C. Patrick (2010) Differential use of trails by forest mammals and the implications for camera trap studies, a case study from Belize, Central America. Biotropica, 42 (1), 126-133. (doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00544.x).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Relative abundance indices are often used to compare species abundance between sites. The indices assume that species have similar detection probabilities, or that differences between detection probabilities are known and can be corrected for.

Indices often consist of encounter frequencies of footprints, burrows, markings or photo captures along trails or transect lines, but the assumption of equal detection probabilities is rarely validated. This study analyses detection probabilities of a range of Neotropical mammals on trails in dense secondary forest, using camera-trap and track data.

Photo captures of the two large cats, jaguars (Panthera onca) and pumas (Puma concolor), were correlated solely with trail variables, while photo captures of their potential prey species had no correlation or negative correlation with trail variables.

The Neotropical mammals varied greatly in their tendency to follow or cross trails based on footprints surveys. This indicates that camera locations on trails will have varying detection probability for these Neotropical mammals.

Even the two similar-sized jaguars and pumas, occupying relatively similar niches, differed subtly in their use of trails. Pumas followed trails more completely while jaguars were more likely to deviate from trails. The ecological significance of these findings is that jaguars seem to be more willing to use the forest matrix away from trails than are pumas.

We conclude that trail-based indices, such as photographic captures or tracks along trails, are not appropriate for comparison between Neotropical species, and not even between relatively similar species like jaguars and pumas.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: January 2010
Keywords: bias, camera trapping, detection probability, jaguars, pumas, relative abundance, trail use
Organisations: Electronics & Computer Science

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 142073
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/142073
PURE UUID: 91d434b0-a238-4d75-b09a-76c9cb3d5339
ORCID for C. Patrick Doncaster: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9406-0693

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Apr 2010 09:01
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:38

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Bart J. Harmsen
Author: Rebecca J. Foster
Author: Scott Silver
Author: Linde Ostro

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×