Being uncertain about what? Procedural fairness effects as a function of general uncertainty and belongingness uncertainty
Being uncertain about what? Procedural fairness effects as a function of general uncertainty and belongingness uncertainty
Do different forms of uncertainty account for different procedural fairness effects? We hypothesized that general uncertainty accounts for fairness judgments, whereas belongingness uncertainty accounts for group identification. Experiment 1 manipulated general versus belongingness uncertainty. Participants in the general uncertainty condition regarded the procedures as fairer when they were granted than denied voice, whereas participants in the belongingness uncertainty condition showed stronger group identification when they were granted than denied voice. Experiment 2 split the belongingness uncertainty condition into family and stranger uncertainty. Only participants in the family-belongingness uncertainty condition identified with their group when they were granted than denied voice. The findings have implications for the construct of uncertainty, models of procedural fairness, and group membership.
1520-1525
De Cremer, David
16aeacc7-ae90-4ab7-9d3c-6818e8b1b6d8
Brebels, Lieven
f36eadc9-7569-4ba5-80f7-1490cf153442
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
November 2008
De Cremer, David
16aeacc7-ae90-4ab7-9d3c-6818e8b1b6d8
Brebels, Lieven
f36eadc9-7569-4ba5-80f7-1490cf153442
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
De Cremer, David, Brebels, Lieven and Sedikides, Constantine
(2008)
Being uncertain about what? Procedural fairness effects as a function of general uncertainty and belongingness uncertainty.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44 (6), .
(doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.010).
Abstract
Do different forms of uncertainty account for different procedural fairness effects? We hypothesized that general uncertainty accounts for fairness judgments, whereas belongingness uncertainty accounts for group identification. Experiment 1 manipulated general versus belongingness uncertainty. Participants in the general uncertainty condition regarded the procedures as fairer when they were granted than denied voice, whereas participants in the belongingness uncertainty condition showed stronger group identification when they were granted than denied voice. Experiment 2 split the belongingness uncertainty condition into family and stranger uncertainty. Only participants in the family-belongingness uncertainty condition identified with their group when they were granted than denied voice. The findings have implications for the construct of uncertainty, models of procedural fairness, and group membership.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: November 2008
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 142445
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/142445
ISSN: 0022-1031
PURE UUID: 1c967c73-80cb-4894-8e68-c63c721f7c12
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 31 Mar 2010 14:10
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:43
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
David De Cremer
Author:
Lieven Brebels
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics