Estimating per-pixel thematic uncertainty in remote sensing classifications
Estimating per-pixel thematic uncertainty in remote sensing classifications
Standard methodologies for estimating the thematic accuracy of hard classifications, such as those using the confusion matrix, do not provide indications of where thematic errors occur. However, spatial variation in thematic error can be a key variable affecting output errors when operations such as change detection are applied. One method of assessing thematic error on a per-pixel basis is to use the outputs of a classifier to estimate thematic uncertainty. Previous studies that have used this approach have generally used a single classifier and so comparisons of the relative accuracy of classifiers for predicting per-pixel thematic uncertainty have not been made. This paper compared three classification methods for predicting thematic uncertainty: the maximum likelihood, the multi-layer perceptron and the probabilistic neural network. The results of the study are discussed in terms of selecting the most suitable classifier for mapping land cover or predicting thematic uncertainty.
209
Brown, K.M.
db289f77-f6e6-4caa-9c0d-7bf80fdd69ab
Foody, G.M.
06e50027-603d-4a5b-88f5-af2bb6235a37
Atkinson, P.M.
96e96579-56fe-424d-a21c-17b6eed13b0b
2009
Brown, K.M.
db289f77-f6e6-4caa-9c0d-7bf80fdd69ab
Foody, G.M.
06e50027-603d-4a5b-88f5-af2bb6235a37
Atkinson, P.M.
96e96579-56fe-424d-a21c-17b6eed13b0b
Brown, K.M., Foody, G.M. and Atkinson, P.M.
(2009)
Estimating per-pixel thematic uncertainty in remote sensing classifications.
International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30 (1), .
(doi:10.1080/01431160802290568).
Abstract
Standard methodologies for estimating the thematic accuracy of hard classifications, such as those using the confusion matrix, do not provide indications of where thematic errors occur. However, spatial variation in thematic error can be a key variable affecting output errors when operations such as change detection are applied. One method of assessing thematic error on a per-pixel basis is to use the outputs of a classifier to estimate thematic uncertainty. Previous studies that have used this approach have generally used a single classifier and so comparisons of the relative accuracy of classifiers for predicting per-pixel thematic uncertainty have not been made. This paper compared three classification methods for predicting thematic uncertainty: the maximum likelihood, the multi-layer perceptron and the probabilistic neural network. The results of the study are discussed in terms of selecting the most suitable classifier for mapping land cover or predicting thematic uncertainty.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2009
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 142883
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/142883
ISSN: 0143-1161
PURE UUID: 3e23a64e-96be-41ae-942c-728a5f19769f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 01 Apr 2010 12:57
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:37
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
K.M. Brown
Author:
G.M. Foody
Author:
P.M. Atkinson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics