The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Effectiveness of five different approaches in management of urinary tract infection: randomised controlled trial

Record type: Article

Objective: To assess the impact of different management strategies in urinary tract infections.

Design: Randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Primary care

Participants: 309 non-pregnant women aged 18-70 presenting with suspected urinary tract infection.

Intervention: Patients were randomised to five management approaches: empirical antibiotics; empirical delayed (by 48 hours) antibiotics; or targeted antibiotics based on a symptom score (two or more of urine cloudiness, urine smell, nocturia, or dysuria), a dipstick result (nitrite or both leucocytes and blood), or a positive result on midstream urine analysis. Self help advice was controlled in each group.

Main outcome measures: Symptom severity (days 2 to 4) and duration, and use of antibiotics.

Results: Patients had 3.5 days of moderately bad symptoms if they took antibiotics immediately. There were no significant differences in duration or severity of symptoms (mean frequency of symptoms on a 0 to 6 scale: immediate antibiotics 2.15, midstream urine 2.08, dipstick 1.74, symptom score 1.77, delayed antibiotics 2.11; likelihood ratio test for the five groups P=0.177).

There were differences in antibiotic use (immediate antibiotics 97%, midstream urine 81%, dipstick 80%, symptom score 90%, delayed antibiotics 77%; P=0.011) and in sending midstream urine samples (immediate antibiotics 23%, midstream urine 89%, dipstick 36%, symptom score 33%, delayed antibiotics 15%; P<0.001).

Patients who waited at least 48 hours to start taking antibiotics reconsulted less (hazard ratio 0.57 (95% confidence interval 0.36 to 0.89), P=0.014) but on average had symptoms for 37% longer than those taking immediate antibiotics (incident rate ratio 1.37 (1.11 to 1.68), P=0.003), particularly the midstream urine group (73% longer, 22% to 140%; none of the other groups had more than 22% longer duration).

Conclusion: All management strategies achieve similar symptom control. There is no advantage in routinely sending midstream urine samples for testing, and antibiotics targeted with dipstick tests with a delayed prescription as backup, or empirical delayed prescription, can help to reduce antibiotic use.

Study registration: National Research Register N0484094184 ISRCTN: 03525333

Full text not available from this repository.

Citation

Little, P., Moore, M.V., Turner, S., Rumsby, K., Warner, G., Lowes, J.A., Smith, H., Hawke, C., Arscott, A., Turner, D. and Mullee, M. (2010) Effectiveness of five different approaches in management of urinary tract infection: randomised controlled trial BMJ, 340, c199. (doi:10.1136/bmj.c199). (PMID:20139214).

More information

Published date: 5 February 2010
Organisations: Community Clinical Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 143631
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/143631
ISSN: 0959-8138
PURE UUID: 327a2d60-dce3-4543-93e8-f7ec7edea25c
ORCID for M.V. Moore: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5127-4509

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Apr 2010 13:54
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 23:09

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: P. Little
Author: M.V. Moore ORCID iD
Author: S. Turner
Author: K. Rumsby
Author: G. Warner
Author: J.A. Lowes
Author: H. Smith
Author: C. Hawke
Author: A. Arscott
Author: D. Turner
Author: M. Mullee

University divisions


Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×