How important are linguistic factors in word skipping during reading?
How important are linguistic factors in word skipping during reading?
The probability of skipping a word is influenced by its processing ease. For instance, a word that is predictable from the preceding context is skipped more often than an unpredictable word. A meta-analysis of studies examining this predictability effect reported effect sizes ranging from 0 to 13%, with an average of 8%. One study does not fit within this picture and reported 23% more skipping of Dutch pronouns in sentences in which the pronoun had no disambiguating value (e.g. ‘Mary was envious of Helen because she never looked so good’) than in sentences where it did have a disambiguating value (e.g. ‘Mary was envious of Albert because she never looked so good’). We re-examined this ambiguity in Dutch using a task that more closely resembles normal reading and observed only a 9% difference in skipping of the pronoun, bringing this linguistic effect in line with the other findings.
157-171
Drieghe, Denis
dfe41922-1cea-47f4-904b-26d5c9fe85ce
Desmet, Timothy
f7e7058a-6fa4-4acb-9b70-2f7ef3c1b8af
Brysbaert, Marc
dfe6bf7d-27f6-4546-82ca-375769276ad5
February 2007
Drieghe, Denis
dfe41922-1cea-47f4-904b-26d5c9fe85ce
Desmet, Timothy
f7e7058a-6fa4-4acb-9b70-2f7ef3c1b8af
Brysbaert, Marc
dfe6bf7d-27f6-4546-82ca-375769276ad5
Drieghe, Denis, Desmet, Timothy and Brysbaert, Marc
(2007)
How important are linguistic factors in word skipping during reading?
British Journal of Psychology, 98 (1), .
(doi:10.1348/000712606X111258).
Abstract
The probability of skipping a word is influenced by its processing ease. For instance, a word that is predictable from the preceding context is skipped more often than an unpredictable word. A meta-analysis of studies examining this predictability effect reported effect sizes ranging from 0 to 13%, with an average of 8%. One study does not fit within this picture and reported 23% more skipping of Dutch pronouns in sentences in which the pronoun had no disambiguating value (e.g. ‘Mary was envious of Helen because she never looked so good’) than in sentences where it did have a disambiguating value (e.g. ‘Mary was envious of Albert because she never looked so good’). We re-examined this ambiguity in Dutch using a task that more closely resembles normal reading and observed only a 9% difference in skipping of the pronoun, bringing this linguistic effect in line with the other findings.
Text
Drieghe,_Desmet,_&_Brysbaert.pdf
- Author's Original
More information
Published date: February 2007
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 144833
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/144833
ISSN: 0007-1269
PURE UUID: 21d1dec8-4661-4238-be01-d5f91579389f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 Jun 2010 10:35
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:55
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Timothy Desmet
Author:
Marc Brysbaert
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics