‘Forging a conviction’ – participants’ experiences of a
western acupuncture randomised controlled trial
‘Forging a conviction’ – participants’ experiences of a
western acupuncture randomised controlled trial
Research into acupuncture has shown that individuals continue to report
favourable clinical effects despite the lack of systematic evidence supporting a
point specific therapeutic effect for real acupuncture treatment. This thesis
presents a qualitative study, nested within a large randomised controlled trial of
acupuncture specifically designed to investigate both specific and non-specific
effects of western acupuncture for osteoarthritis pain. The aim was to explore the
non specific effects of acupuncture in a trial context from the participants’
perspective, in particular the therapeutic relationship and any additional
influences on the patient experience that might lead to non-specific effects on
outcomes.
Participants were recruited from hip or knee joint replacement waiting lists and
randomised to one of three treatments (real acupuncture or 2 placebo controls)
and one of two consultation conditions (empathic or non- empathic). The
qualitative methodology was grounded theory. Data collection combined 27 post
trial audio taped, semi structured interviews with post treatment debriefing,
participant and non participant observation and personal reflections.
The findings of this study identified a core category of ‘forging a conviction’
and a substantive theory of ‘active trial participation’ was developed. Participants
gave reasons for entering the trial and for maintaining their commitment to it,
despite numerous barriers. These experiences helped to forge convictions about
the trial interventions and their effects. As a result a combination of specific and
non specific influences appeared to impact on the participants’ reporting of
outcomes, leading to discrepancies between the quantitative and qualitative data.
This theory of ‘active participation’ in clinical trials challenges some of the
basic assumptions of randomized controlled trials, most notably that participants
are passive recipients of an intervention and report its effects factually.
Hill, Clare Marie
03dd8f38-cac1-495a-808f-f38721076572
May 2009
Hill, Clare Marie
03dd8f38-cac1-495a-808f-f38721076572
Walker, Jan
592c6998-aa44-4ef2-a225-bdff4cb0ee61
White, Peter
f33829fd-24c9-4b44-a148-24eca9d52253
Lewith, George
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625
Hill, Clare Marie
(2009)
‘Forging a conviction’ – participants’ experiences of a
western acupuncture randomised controlled trial.
University of Southampton, School of Medicine, Doctoral Thesis, 246pp.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
Research into acupuncture has shown that individuals continue to report
favourable clinical effects despite the lack of systematic evidence supporting a
point specific therapeutic effect for real acupuncture treatment. This thesis
presents a qualitative study, nested within a large randomised controlled trial of
acupuncture specifically designed to investigate both specific and non-specific
effects of western acupuncture for osteoarthritis pain. The aim was to explore the
non specific effects of acupuncture in a trial context from the participants’
perspective, in particular the therapeutic relationship and any additional
influences on the patient experience that might lead to non-specific effects on
outcomes.
Participants were recruited from hip or knee joint replacement waiting lists and
randomised to one of three treatments (real acupuncture or 2 placebo controls)
and one of two consultation conditions (empathic or non- empathic). The
qualitative methodology was grounded theory. Data collection combined 27 post
trial audio taped, semi structured interviews with post treatment debriefing,
participant and non participant observation and personal reflections.
The findings of this study identified a core category of ‘forging a conviction’
and a substantive theory of ‘active trial participation’ was developed. Participants
gave reasons for entering the trial and for maintaining their commitment to it,
despite numerous barriers. These experiences helped to forge convictions about
the trial interventions and their effects. As a result a combination of specific and
non specific influences appeared to impact on the participants’ reporting of
outcomes, leading to discrepancies between the quantitative and qualitative data.
This theory of ‘active participation’ in clinical trials challenges some of the
basic assumptions of randomized controlled trials, most notably that participants
are passive recipients of an intervention and report its effects factually.
Text
ClareThesis.pdf
- Other
More information
Published date: May 2009
Organisations:
University of Southampton
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 144863
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/144863
PURE UUID: a8a4ab22-51c2-41e9-8c63-18b9bb31e81f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 24 Jan 2011 17:01
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 00:48
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Clare Marie Hill
Thesis advisor:
Jan Walker
Thesis advisor:
Peter White
Thesis advisor:
George Lewith
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics