The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

‘Forging a conviction’ – participants’ experiences of a western acupuncture randomised controlled trial

Hill, Clare Marie (2009) ‘Forging a conviction’ – participants’ experiences of a western acupuncture randomised controlled trial University of Southampton, School of Medicine, Doctoral Thesis , 246pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)


Research into acupuncture has shown that individuals continue to report
favourable clinical effects despite the lack of systematic evidence supporting a
point specific therapeutic effect for real acupuncture treatment. This thesis
presents a qualitative study, nested within a large randomised controlled trial of
acupuncture specifically designed to investigate both specific and non-specific
effects of western acupuncture for osteoarthritis pain. The aim was to explore the
non specific effects of acupuncture in a trial context from the participants’
perspective, in particular the therapeutic relationship and any additional
influences on the patient experience that might lead to non-specific effects on

Participants were recruited from hip or knee joint replacement waiting lists and
randomised to one of three treatments (real acupuncture or 2 placebo controls)
and one of two consultation conditions (empathic or non- empathic). The
qualitative methodology was grounded theory. Data collection combined 27 post
trial audio taped, semi structured interviews with post treatment debriefing,
participant and non participant observation and personal reflections.

The findings of this study identified a core category of ‘forging a conviction’
and a substantive theory of ‘active trial participation’ was developed. Participants
gave reasons for entering the trial and for maintaining their commitment to it,
despite numerous barriers. These experiences helped to forge convictions about
the trial interventions and their effects. As a result a combination of specific and
non specific influences appeared to impact on the participants’ reporting of
outcomes, leading to discrepancies between the quantitative and qualitative data.

This theory of ‘active participation’ in clinical trials challenges some of the
basic assumptions of randomized controlled trials, most notably that participants
are passive recipients of an intervention and report its effects factually.

PDF ClareThesis.pdf - Other
Download (1MB)

More information

Published date: May 2009
Organisations: University of Southampton


Local EPrints ID: 144863
PURE UUID: a8a4ab22-51c2-41e9-8c63-18b9bb31e81f

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Jan 2011 17:01
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 23:07

Export record


Author: Clare Marie Hill
Thesis advisor: Jan Walker
Thesis advisor: Peter White
Thesis advisor: GEORGE LEWITH

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton:

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.