Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements in text reading: does an extra space make a difference?
Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements in text reading: does an extra space make a difference?
Schiepers (1980) proposed that in text reading, the currently fixated word and the next word are processed in parallel but with a time delay of 90 ms per degree of eccentricity. In his model, the benefit of seeing the upcoming word is due to the fact that the parafoveal information from fixation n is combined with the foveal information from fixation n+1 to boost word recognition, at least when the fixation on word n is of an optimal duration (between 210 and 270 ms). We tested this assumption by adding an extra blank space between the foveal and the parafoveal word. According to the model, this should result in a 30 ms longer processing time for the foveal word. However, reading time was shorter for a word followed by a double space than for a word followed by a single space. An effect of parafoveal word length was also observed with a longer word in the parafovea leading to shorter fixation times on the foveal word. Implications of these low-level parafoveal-on-foveal effects are discussed.
reading, parafoveal-on-foveal effects
1693-1706
Drieghe, Denis
dfe41922-1cea-47f4-904b-26d5c9fe85ce
Brysbaert, Marc
dfe6bf7d-27f6-4546-82ca-375769276ad5
Desmet, Timothy
f7e7058a-6fa4-4acb-9b70-2f7ef3c1b8af
June 2005
Drieghe, Denis
dfe41922-1cea-47f4-904b-26d5c9fe85ce
Brysbaert, Marc
dfe6bf7d-27f6-4546-82ca-375769276ad5
Desmet, Timothy
f7e7058a-6fa4-4acb-9b70-2f7ef3c1b8af
Drieghe, Denis, Brysbaert, Marc and Desmet, Timothy
(2005)
Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements in text reading: does an extra space make a difference?
Vision Research, 45 (13), .
(doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.010).
Abstract
Schiepers (1980) proposed that in text reading, the currently fixated word and the next word are processed in parallel but with a time delay of 90 ms per degree of eccentricity. In his model, the benefit of seeing the upcoming word is due to the fact that the parafoveal information from fixation n is combined with the foveal information from fixation n+1 to boost word recognition, at least when the fixation on word n is of an optimal duration (between 210 and 270 ms). We tested this assumption by adding an extra blank space between the foveal and the parafoveal word. According to the model, this should result in a 30 ms longer processing time for the foveal word. However, reading time was shorter for a word followed by a double space than for a word followed by a single space. An effect of parafoveal word length was also observed with a longer word in the parafovea leading to shorter fixation times on the foveal word. Implications of these low-level parafoveal-on-foveal effects are discussed.
Text
Drieghe,_Brysbaert_&_Desmet_(2005).pdf
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Published date: June 2005
Keywords:
reading, parafoveal-on-foveal effects
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 145105
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/145105
ISSN: 0042-6989
PURE UUID: 69da0ffc-9695-4617-9ea0-4b2fbcce00f6
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 28 Jun 2010 08:49
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:55
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Marc Brysbaert
Author:
Timothy Desmet
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics