Potential improvements in the characterization of forest canopy gaps caused by windthrow using fine spatial resolution multispectral data: comparing hard and soft classification techniques
Potential improvements in the characterization of forest canopy gaps caused by windthrow using fine spatial resolution multispectral data: comparing hard and soft classification techniques
Gaps often form in forest canopies due to windthrow and have important management and ecological implications. Remote sensing has considerable potential for the provision of information on gap properties but this has not been fully realized. This is largely due to the use of conventional (hard, one-pixel one-class) image analysis techniques and imagery with a relatively coarse spatial resolution. This article investigates the potential to extract information on gap properties from fine spatial resolution airborne thematic mapper imagery using soft classification techniques that allow image pixels to have multiple and partial class membership. It is shown that a standard hard maximum likelihood classification may be used to derive an accurate map of the land cover of a forested site (95.1%) from which gaps in a canopy of Sitka spruce were accurately identified (94.5%). The maximum likelihood classification was also softened by outputting probabilities of class membership for each pixel. Softening the classification increased the information on gap properties that could be extracted from the data. In particular, the accuracy with which key gap properties, such as gap area, perimeter length and shape, were estimated was higher in the outputs of the softened than hard classification. Thus, while strong correlations between the remotely sensed and ground data estimates of gap area (r 0.96) and perimeter (r 0.87), based on a sample of 36 gaps, were derived from all classifications, the accuracy with which gap properties were estimated was generally highest when a soft classification was used. For example, the use of a soft rather than hard classification resulted in the root mean square error in estimating gap area declining from 144.90 to 132.87 m2. Furthermore, the soft classification allowed the sharpness of the gap boundary to be estimated, enabling further gap properties to be inferred. In particular, the soft classification output enabled the direction of the wind event causing the initial damage to be estimated, and it may aid the definition of sites with a future risk of windthrow.
Gap boundary, soft classification, environmental management, forest, forest management, forest resources, forestry, forestry research, forestry science, natural resources, natural resource management
444-445
Foody, G.M.
06e50027-603d-4a5b-88f5-af2bb6235a37
Jackson, R.G.
610c7902-0823-4574-ad4f-3ea7c8f0690f
Quine, C.P.
3a832caa-2a8c-484f-ac91-5235055ad032
2003
Foody, G.M.
06e50027-603d-4a5b-88f5-af2bb6235a37
Jackson, R.G.
610c7902-0823-4574-ad4f-3ea7c8f0690f
Quine, C.P.
3a832caa-2a8c-484f-ac91-5235055ad032
Foody, G.M., Jackson, R.G. and Quine, C.P.
(2003)
Potential improvements in the characterization of forest canopy gaps caused by windthrow using fine spatial resolution multispectral data: comparing hard and soft classification techniques.
Forest Science, 49 (3), .
Abstract
Gaps often form in forest canopies due to windthrow and have important management and ecological implications. Remote sensing has considerable potential for the provision of information on gap properties but this has not been fully realized. This is largely due to the use of conventional (hard, one-pixel one-class) image analysis techniques and imagery with a relatively coarse spatial resolution. This article investigates the potential to extract information on gap properties from fine spatial resolution airborne thematic mapper imagery using soft classification techniques that allow image pixels to have multiple and partial class membership. It is shown that a standard hard maximum likelihood classification may be used to derive an accurate map of the land cover of a forested site (95.1%) from which gaps in a canopy of Sitka spruce were accurately identified (94.5%). The maximum likelihood classification was also softened by outputting probabilities of class membership for each pixel. Softening the classification increased the information on gap properties that could be extracted from the data. In particular, the accuracy with which key gap properties, such as gap area, perimeter length and shape, were estimated was higher in the outputs of the softened than hard classification. Thus, while strong correlations between the remotely sensed and ground data estimates of gap area (r 0.96) and perimeter (r 0.87), based on a sample of 36 gaps, were derived from all classifications, the accuracy with which gap properties were estimated was generally highest when a soft classification was used. For example, the use of a soft rather than hard classification resulted in the root mean square error in estimating gap area declining from 144.90 to 132.87 m2. Furthermore, the soft classification allowed the sharpness of the gap boundary to be estimated, enabling further gap properties to be inferred. In particular, the soft classification output enabled the direction of the wind event causing the initial damage to be estimated, and it may aid the definition of sites with a future risk of windthrow.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2003
Keywords:
Gap boundary, soft classification, environmental management, forest, forest management, forest resources, forestry, forestry research, forestry science, natural resources, natural resource management
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 14544
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/14544
ISSN: 0015-749X
PURE UUID: 1bd264cd-33ac-42de-b9ab-0314ad7ecafe
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 22 Feb 2005
Last modified: 22 Jul 2022 20:24
Export record
Contributors
Author:
G.M. Foody
Author:
R.G. Jackson
Author:
C.P. Quine
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics