The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Continuous versus on-demand pharmacotherapy of allergic rhinitis: evidence and practice

Continuous versus on-demand pharmacotherapy of allergic rhinitis: evidence and practice
Continuous versus on-demand pharmacotherapy of allergic rhinitis: evidence and practice
This review aims to compare continuous with on-demand pharmacotherapy of allergic rhinitis by focusing on pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, safety, effectiveness, cost and cost-effectiveness considerations. A working party of experts reviewed and discussed the literature and guidelines, and conducted a qualitative analysis of the Summary of Product Characteristics of specific medicines. With respect to medicines, the working party limited itself to antihistamines, nasal corticosteroids and leukotriene antagonists. Based on a review of the evidence from a multidisciplinary perspective, this article makes pharmacotherapeutic recommendations that are easy, functional and applicable to daily practice in primary care. The pharmacotherapeutic evidence for continuous versus on-demand treatment of allergic rhinitis was limited. Clearly, for corticosteroids, their mechanism of action in allergic rhinitis of reducing allergic inflammation requires continuous therapy at least for the duration of symptoms. For H(1)-antihistamines, some trials suggest that continuous treatment is preferable but more studies are needed to confirm this conclusion. For both H(1)-antihistamines and nasal corticosteroids safety data indicate that continuous treatment may be given without fears of adverse consequences, although a distinction can be made between the first and the second generation antihistamines. With regard to the cost and cost-effectiveness implications of continuous therapy versus on-demand therapy, more studies are necessary before definitive conclusions may be made
Laekeman, Gert
307ee44c-0888-4397-b9c5-db56af3a28eb
Simoens, Steven
5910c0fc-2a40-4a4c-b105-d0387e6d361b
Buffels, Johan
13c6bea7-3d2f-46fd-8cdc-f040a74843d0
Gillard, Michel
56bd2536-a08e-4c40-b0cf-7242d1826fb3
Robillard, Thibert
e28b0588-d589-491c-95f1-e012f7695456
Strolin Benedetti, Margherita
4dffc980-2f11-4f1a-85ce-dd6034a6b3ab
Watelet, Jean-Baptiste
cc8cfbaf-8ff7-4e03-ab3b-d350bc63ab60
Liekendael, Georges
107a67e9-b69a-476c-a9f2-f4529ab6e65e
Church, Martin K.
dad189d5-866e-4ae1-b005-0d87f74282b8
Ghys, Liesbet
f524c677-ece0-4725-b887-35549837adfd
Laekeman, Gert
307ee44c-0888-4397-b9c5-db56af3a28eb
Simoens, Steven
5910c0fc-2a40-4a4c-b105-d0387e6d361b
Buffels, Johan
13c6bea7-3d2f-46fd-8cdc-f040a74843d0
Gillard, Michel
56bd2536-a08e-4c40-b0cf-7242d1826fb3
Robillard, Thibert
e28b0588-d589-491c-95f1-e012f7695456
Strolin Benedetti, Margherita
4dffc980-2f11-4f1a-85ce-dd6034a6b3ab
Watelet, Jean-Baptiste
cc8cfbaf-8ff7-4e03-ab3b-d350bc63ab60
Liekendael, Georges
107a67e9-b69a-476c-a9f2-f4529ab6e65e
Ghys, Liesbet
f524c677-ece0-4725-b887-35549837adfd
Church, Martin K.
dad189d5-866e-4ae1-b005-0d87f74282b8

Laekeman, Gert, Simoens, Steven, Buffels, Johan, Gillard, Michel, Robillard, Thibert, Strolin Benedetti, Margherita, Watelet, Jean-Baptiste, Liekendael, Georges and Church, Martin K. , Ghys, Liesbet (ed.) (2010) Continuous versus on-demand pharmacotherapy of allergic rhinitis: evidence and practice. Respiratory Medicine. (doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2010.01.006).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This review aims to compare continuous with on-demand pharmacotherapy of allergic rhinitis by focusing on pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, safety, effectiveness, cost and cost-effectiveness considerations. A working party of experts reviewed and discussed the literature and guidelines, and conducted a qualitative analysis of the Summary of Product Characteristics of specific medicines. With respect to medicines, the working party limited itself to antihistamines, nasal corticosteroids and leukotriene antagonists. Based on a review of the evidence from a multidisciplinary perspective, this article makes pharmacotherapeutic recommendations that are easy, functional and applicable to daily practice in primary care. The pharmacotherapeutic evidence for continuous versus on-demand treatment of allergic rhinitis was limited. Clearly, for corticosteroids, their mechanism of action in allergic rhinitis of reducing allergic inflammation requires continuous therapy at least for the duration of symptoms. For H(1)-antihistamines, some trials suggest that continuous treatment is preferable but more studies are needed to confirm this conclusion. For both H(1)-antihistamines and nasal corticosteroids safety data indicate that continuous treatment may be given without fears of adverse consequences, although a distinction can be made between the first and the second generation antihistamines. With regard to the cost and cost-effectiveness implications of continuous therapy versus on-demand therapy, more studies are necessary before definitive conclusions may be made

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 15 February 2010

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 145667
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/145667
PURE UUID: e859ab55-152f-4b46-bb13-ce3a991402eb

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Apr 2010 12:40
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 00:51

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Gert Laekeman
Author: Steven Simoens
Author: Johan Buffels
Author: Michel Gillard
Author: Thibert Robillard
Author: Margherita Strolin Benedetti
Author: Jean-Baptiste Watelet
Author: Georges Liekendael
Editor: Liesbet Ghys
Author: Martin K. Church

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×