The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Estimation of the diameter–charge distribution in polydisperse electrically charged sprays of electrically insulating liquids

Estimation of the diameter–charge distribution in polydisperse electrically charged sprays of electrically insulating liquids
Estimation of the diameter–charge distribution in polydisperse electrically charged sprays of electrically insulating liquids
The majority of scientific and industrial electrical
spray applications make use of sprays that contain a
range of drop diameters. Indirect evidence suggests the
mean drop diameter and the mean drop charge level are
usually correlated. In addition, within each drop diameter
class there is every reason to suspect a distribution of
charge levels exist for a particular drop diameter class. This paper presents an experimental method that uses the joint
PDF of drop velocity and diameter, obtained from phase
Doppler anemometry measurements, and directly obtained
spatially resolved distributions of the mass and charge flux
to obtain a drop diameter and charge frequency distribution.
The method is demonstrated using several data-sets
obtained from experimental measurements of steady polydisperse
sprays of an electrically insulating liquid produced
with the charge injection technique. The space charge
repulsion in the spray plume produces a hollow cone spray
structure. In addition an approximate self-similarity is
observed, with the maximum radial mass and charge flow
occurring at r/d * 200. The charge flux profile is slightly
offset from the mass flux profile, and this gives direct
evidence that the spray specific charge increases from
approximately 20% of the bulk mean spray specific charge
on the spray axis to approximately 200% of the bulk mean
specific charge in the periphery of the spray. The results
from the drop charge estimation model suggest a complex
picture of the correlation between drop charge and drop
diameter, with spray specific charge, injection velocity and
orifice diameter all contributing to the shape of the drop
diameter–charge distribution. Mean drop charge as a
function of the Rayleigh limit is approximately 0.2, and is
invariant with drop diameter and also across the spray
cases tested.
0723-4864
1151-1171
Shrimpton, John S.
9cf82d2e-2f00-4ddf-bd19-9aff443784af
Rigit, A.R.H.
e832151c-cdc0-4c85-af64-0adb6614a3f5
Shrimpton, John S.
9cf82d2e-2f00-4ddf-bd19-9aff443784af
Rigit, A.R.H.
e832151c-cdc0-4c85-af64-0adb6614a3f5

Shrimpton, John S. and Rigit, A.R.H. (2009) Estimation of the diameter–charge distribution in polydisperse electrically charged sprays of electrically insulating liquids. Experiments in Fluids, 46 (6), 1151-1171. (doi:10.1007/s00348-009-0626-5).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The majority of scientific and industrial electrical
spray applications make use of sprays that contain a
range of drop diameters. Indirect evidence suggests the
mean drop diameter and the mean drop charge level are
usually correlated. In addition, within each drop diameter
class there is every reason to suspect a distribution of
charge levels exist for a particular drop diameter class. This paper presents an experimental method that uses the joint
PDF of drop velocity and diameter, obtained from phase
Doppler anemometry measurements, and directly obtained
spatially resolved distributions of the mass and charge flux
to obtain a drop diameter and charge frequency distribution.
The method is demonstrated using several data-sets
obtained from experimental measurements of steady polydisperse
sprays of an electrically insulating liquid produced
with the charge injection technique. The space charge
repulsion in the spray plume produces a hollow cone spray
structure. In addition an approximate self-similarity is
observed, with the maximum radial mass and charge flow
occurring at r/d * 200. The charge flux profile is slightly
offset from the mass flux profile, and this gives direct
evidence that the spray specific charge increases from
approximately 20% of the bulk mean spray specific charge
on the spray axis to approximately 200% of the bulk mean
specific charge in the periphery of the spray. The results
from the drop charge estimation model suggest a complex
picture of the correlation between drop charge and drop
diameter, with spray specific charge, injection velocity and
orifice diameter all contributing to the shape of the drop
diameter–charge distribution. Mean drop charge as a
function of the Rayleigh limit is approximately 0.2, and is
invariant with drop diameter and also across the spray
cases tested.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: June 2009

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 145671
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/145671
ISSN: 0723-4864
PURE UUID: 19b19207-7485-4e03-bbd4-cf5447c2c240

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Apr 2010 13:19
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 00:51

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: A.R.H. Rigit

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×