Eye movements and non-canonical reading: comments on Kennedy and Pynte (2008)
Eye movements and non-canonical reading: comments on Kennedy and Pynte (2008)
Kennedy and Pynte [Kennedy, A., & Pynte, J. (2008). The consequences of violations to reading order: An eye movement analysis. Vision Research, 48, 2309–2320] presented data that they suggested pose problems for models of eye movement control in reading in which words are encoded serially. They focus on situations in which pairs of words are fixated out of order (i.e., the first word is skipped and the second fixated prior to a regression back to the first word). We strongly disagree with their claims and contest their arguments. We argue that their data set was obtained selectively and the events they believe are problematic do not occur frequently during reading. Furthermore, we do not consider that Kennedy and Pynte’s arguments pose serious difficulties for serial models of reading such as E-Z Reader
2232-2236
Rayner, Keith
15f4ff90-d631-457b-a055-3944b702ea27
Pollatsek, Alexander
63e93bd7-111e-4338-b922-9c5c0e6ba467
Liversedge, Simon P.
3ebda3f3-d930-4f89-85d5-5654d8fe7dee
Reichle, Erik D.
44dc4e6a-e5e2-47c5-9a09-2ef759db0583
28 August 2009
Rayner, Keith
15f4ff90-d631-457b-a055-3944b702ea27
Pollatsek, Alexander
63e93bd7-111e-4338-b922-9c5c0e6ba467
Liversedge, Simon P.
3ebda3f3-d930-4f89-85d5-5654d8fe7dee
Reichle, Erik D.
44dc4e6a-e5e2-47c5-9a09-2ef759db0583
Rayner, Keith, Pollatsek, Alexander, Liversedge, Simon P. and Reichle, Erik D.
(2009)
Eye movements and non-canonical reading: comments on Kennedy and Pynte (2008).
Vision Research, 49 (17), .
(doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.10.013).
(PMID:19000705)
Abstract
Kennedy and Pynte [Kennedy, A., & Pynte, J. (2008). The consequences of violations to reading order: An eye movement analysis. Vision Research, 48, 2309–2320] presented data that they suggested pose problems for models of eye movement control in reading in which words are encoded serially. They focus on situations in which pairs of words are fixated out of order (i.e., the first word is skipped and the second fixated prior to a regression back to the first word). We strongly disagree with their claims and contest their arguments. We argue that their data set was obtained selectively and the events they believe are problematic do not occur frequently during reading. Furthermore, we do not consider that Kennedy and Pynte’s arguments pose serious difficulties for serial models of reading such as E-Z Reader
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 28 August 2009
Organisations:
Psychology
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 145749
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/145749
ISSN: 0042-6989
PURE UUID: 736d2a48-15ab-4b68-b3fd-ddaa701adbbb
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 19 Apr 2010 13:53
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 00:52
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Keith Rayner
Author:
Alexander Pollatsek
Author:
Simon P. Liversedge
Author:
Erik D. Reichle
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics