Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible
Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible
Several prominent models of reading posit that attention is distributed to support the parallel lexical processing of multiple words. We contend that the auxiliary assumptions underlying this attention-gradient hypothesis are not well founded. Here, we address three specific issues related to the ongoing debate about attention allocation during reading: (i) why the attention-gradient hypothesis is widely endorsed, (ii) why processing several words in parallel in reading is implausible and (iii) why attention must be allocated to only one word at a time. Full consideration of these arguments supports the hypothesis that attention is allocated serially during reading.
115-119
Reichle, Erik D.
44dc4e6a-e5e2-47c5-9a09-2ef759db0583
Liversedge, Simon P.
3ebda3f3-d930-4f89-85d5-5654d8fe7dee
Pollatsek, Alexander
63e93bd7-111e-4338-b922-9c5c0e6ba467
Rayner, Keith
15f4ff90-d631-457b-a055-3944b702ea27
March 2009
Reichle, Erik D.
44dc4e6a-e5e2-47c5-9a09-2ef759db0583
Liversedge, Simon P.
3ebda3f3-d930-4f89-85d5-5654d8fe7dee
Pollatsek, Alexander
63e93bd7-111e-4338-b922-9c5c0e6ba467
Rayner, Keith
15f4ff90-d631-457b-a055-3944b702ea27
Reichle, Erik D., Liversedge, Simon P., Pollatsek, Alexander and Rayner, Keith
(2009)
Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13 (3), .
(doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.12.002).
(PMID:19223223)
Abstract
Several prominent models of reading posit that attention is distributed to support the parallel lexical processing of multiple words. We contend that the auxiliary assumptions underlying this attention-gradient hypothesis are not well founded. Here, we address three specific issues related to the ongoing debate about attention allocation during reading: (i) why the attention-gradient hypothesis is widely endorsed, (ii) why processing several words in parallel in reading is implausible and (iii) why attention must be allocated to only one word at a time. Full consideration of these arguments supports the hypothesis that attention is allocated serially during reading.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: March 2009
Organisations:
Cognition, Psychology
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 145751
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/145751
ISSN: 1364-6613
PURE UUID: 26f3c3b5-ab7b-42e5-bd1b-a94f11a1d5b0
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 19 Apr 2010 14:02
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 00:52
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Erik D. Reichle
Author:
Simon P. Liversedge
Author:
Alexander Pollatsek
Author:
Keith Rayner
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics