The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Is an azo-free diet nutritionally superior than one containing azo-dyes?

Is an azo-free diet nutritionally superior than one containing azo-dyes?
Is an azo-free diet nutritionally superior than one containing azo-dyes?
Background: Few data are available in the literature as to
whether an additive-free diet is more nutritious when
compared to one that contains azo-dyes. The aim of this
study was to investigate whether there is a significant
difference in the nutritional content of an azo-free diet
compared to one that contains azo-dyes. This formed
part of an extension of a study that looked at the effect
of food additives on behaviour of children (Bateman,
2004).

Methods: Azo-dyes [(E102), (E104), (E110), (E122),
(E123), 4R (E124), (E127), (E128), (E129), (E131), (E132),
(E133), (E142), (E151), (E154), (E155), (E180)] and a
preservative [(Sodium benzoate (E211)] were eliminated
from the diet of children. The study dietitian advised
families on how to avoid foods that contain food colours
and preservatives such as those found in certain brands of
beverages, sweets, cakes, ice lollies, desserts, jam and
crisps. To aid compliance to the diet, suitable alternatives
were recommended. The parents of 21 children (11
females) aged 8–9 years completed a 7 day food diary
(baseline) before and during week 3 of the diet period.
The food diaries were collected and coded for portion
sizes by the study dietitian and analysed using CompEat.
Nutrient values were compared to the recommended
nutrient intake. The data was analysed using SPSS 12 and
paired samples t-test (significance level P £ 0.005).
Results: There was no significant difference in energy,
protein or fat intake between baseline diet and the azo-dye
free diet. There was a reduction in the mean intake of
carbohydrate (P = 0.000), sugar (P = 0.000), phosphorous
(P = 0.005), magnesium (P = 0.002), potassium
(P = 0.005), chloride (P = 0.003) and vitamin C (P = 0.002)
when an azo-free diet was followed.
Discussions: Any dietary manipulation may effect overall
nutrient intake. The effect may result in a nutritionally
superior diet but this is not always the case (Isolauri
et al., 1998). The children in this study showed that
eliminating azo-dyes from their diet resulted in their
intake of two micronutrients (potassium and magnesium)
and one macronutrient (carbohydrate) being below
that recommended for their age (Department of Health,
1991).

Conclusion: Elimination diets may have a detrimental effect
on nutritional intake, even when the food that is
eliminated is perceived as unhealthy. Any nutritional
manipulation should be made with caution and the resultant
diet should be assessed to ensure its nutritional adequacy.
0952-3871
465-466
Lok, K. Y. W.
07cc49e8-c35a-47b3-a97f-7533f0c1c5fd
Grimshaw, K.E.C.
766b6cf0-347a-447d-aeab-f07366f8ce28
McCann, Donna C.
48792fe1-241f-491b-a5a5-61c8c02c314d
Stevenson, Jim E.
0c85d29b-d294-43cb-ab8d-75e4737478e1
Lok, K. Y. W.
07cc49e8-c35a-47b3-a97f-7533f0c1c5fd
Grimshaw, K.E.C.
766b6cf0-347a-447d-aeab-f07366f8ce28
McCann, Donna C.
48792fe1-241f-491b-a5a5-61c8c02c314d
Stevenson, Jim E.
0c85d29b-d294-43cb-ab8d-75e4737478e1

Lok, K. Y. W., Grimshaw, K.E.C., McCann, Donna C. and Stevenson, Jim E. (2006) Is an azo-free diet nutritionally superior than one containing azo-dyes? Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 19, (6), pp. 465-466. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-277X.2006.00734.x).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Few data are available in the literature as to
whether an additive-free diet is more nutritious when
compared to one that contains azo-dyes. The aim of this
study was to investigate whether there is a significant
difference in the nutritional content of an azo-free diet
compared to one that contains azo-dyes. This formed
part of an extension of a study that looked at the effect
of food additives on behaviour of children (Bateman,
2004).

Methods: Azo-dyes [(E102), (E104), (E110), (E122),
(E123), 4R (E124), (E127), (E128), (E129), (E131), (E132),
(E133), (E142), (E151), (E154), (E155), (E180)] and a
preservative [(Sodium benzoate (E211)] were eliminated
from the diet of children. The study dietitian advised
families on how to avoid foods that contain food colours
and preservatives such as those found in certain brands of
beverages, sweets, cakes, ice lollies, desserts, jam and
crisps. To aid compliance to the diet, suitable alternatives
were recommended. The parents of 21 children (11
females) aged 8–9 years completed a 7 day food diary
(baseline) before and during week 3 of the diet period.
The food diaries were collected and coded for portion
sizes by the study dietitian and analysed using CompEat.
Nutrient values were compared to the recommended
nutrient intake. The data was analysed using SPSS 12 and
paired samples t-test (significance level P £ 0.005).
Results: There was no significant difference in energy,
protein or fat intake between baseline diet and the azo-dye
free diet. There was a reduction in the mean intake of
carbohydrate (P = 0.000), sugar (P = 0.000), phosphorous
(P = 0.005), magnesium (P = 0.002), potassium
(P = 0.005), chloride (P = 0.003) and vitamin C (P = 0.002)
when an azo-free diet was followed.
Discussions: Any dietary manipulation may effect overall
nutrient intake. The effect may result in a nutritionally
superior diet but this is not always the case (Isolauri
et al., 1998). The children in this study showed that
eliminating azo-dyes from their diet resulted in their
intake of two micronutrients (potassium and magnesium)
and one macronutrient (carbohydrate) being below
that recommended for their age (Department of Health,
1991).

Conclusion: Elimination diets may have a detrimental effect
on nutritional intake, even when the food that is
eliminated is perceived as unhealthy. Any nutritional
manipulation should be made with caution and the resultant
diet should be assessed to ensure its nutritional adequacy.

PDF fulltext_LOK.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: December 2006
Venue - Dates: British Dietetic Association Conference 2006, 2006-12-01

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 146103
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/146103
ISSN: 0952-3871
PURE UUID: 5e8bc7c3-3d93-4009-b53a-9803914e9c80

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Jun 2010 14:34
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 23:05

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: K. Y. W. Lok
Author: K.E.C. Grimshaw
Author: Donna C. McCann

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×