The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Patients' and doctors' views on depression severity questionnaires incentivised in UK quality and outcomes framework: qualitative study

Dowrick, Christopher, Leydon, Geraldine M., McBride, Anita, Howe, Amanda, Burgess, Hana, Clarke, Pamela, Maisey, Sue and Kendrick, Tony (2009) Patients' and doctors' views on depression severity questionnaires incentivised in UK quality and outcomes framework: qualitative study BMJ, 338, b663. (doi:10.1136/bmj.b663). (PMID:19299474).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: to gain understanding of general practitioners’ and patients’ opinions of the routine introduction of standardised measures of severity of depression through the UK general practice quality and outcomes framework.
Design Semistructured qualitative interview study, with purposive sampling and constant comparative analysis.

Participants: 34 general practitioners and 24 patients.

Setting: 38 general practices in three sites in England: Southampton, Liverpool, and Norfolk.

Results: patients generally favoured the measures of severity for depression, whereas general practitioners were generally cautious about the validity and utility of such measures and sceptical about the motives behind their introduction. Both general practitioners and patients considered that assessments of severity should be seen as one aspect of holistic care. General practitioners considered their practical wisdom and clinical judgment ("phronesis") to be more important than objective assessments and were concerned that the assessments reduced the human element of the consultation. Patients were more positive about the questionnaires, seeing them as an efficient and structured supplement to medical judgment and as evidence that general practitioners were taking their problems seriously through a full assessment. General practitioners and patients were aware of the potential for manipulation of indicators: for economic reasons for doctors and for patients to avoid stigma or achieve desired outcomes.

Conclusions: despite general practitioners’ caution about measures of severity for depression, these may benefit primary care consultations by increasing patients’ confidence that general practitioners are correct in their diagnosis and are making systematic efforts to assess and manage their mental health problems. Further education of primary care staff may optimise the use and interpretation of depression questionnaires.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 19 March 2009
Organisations: Community Clinical Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 146255
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/146255
ISSN: 0959-8138
PURE UUID: b875c256-315d-48ac-8cac-476ad85f55bc
ORCID for Tony Kendrick: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1618-9381

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Apr 2010 09:16
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 23:05

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Christopher Dowrick
Author: Anita McBride
Author: Amanda Howe
Author: Hana Burgess
Author: Pamela Clarke
Author: Sue Maisey
Author: Tony Kendrick ORCID iD

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×