The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Management and behaviour of pet rabbits in Switzerland

Management and behaviour of pet rabbits in Switzerland
Management and behaviour of pet rabbits in Switzerland
Introduction: Problem behaviour in pet rabbits may be related to inappropriate environments (McBride et al, 2004). Laboratory studies, e.g. Chi et al (2004) have shown a causal connection between management and behaviour change. The present study surveyed Swiss rabbit owners to investigate the relationship between husbandry and rabbit behaviour.

Methodology: Questionnaire data of housing, social grouping, feeding, exercise, interaction with owners and owner attachment (Zasloff, 1996) was collected. 21 Likert scale questions, such as ‘does your rabbit bite when being caressed?’ gave data of destructive, marking, affiliative and aggressive behaviour towards people and conspecifcs. 280 questionnaires were distributed to pet owners via veterinary surgeries in Switzerland. Data was analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS).

Results: 80 questionnaires were suitable for analysis. 98.8% of the pet rabbits were provided with hay, 96% with objects to chew. Most housing systems contained enrichment objects in addition to water or food bowls. 45% of the rabbits were kept inside the house or apartment, 55% outside. House rabbits were more frequently kept as single animals, the mean size of their housing systems was smaller, interactions with people were longer and consisted of more play and caressing. All respondents rated rabbit behaviour equally. Rabbit attachment behaviours scored high (mean=3.1918, std.deviation=1.070) and were positively correlated with owner attachment [r=0.389, p=0.002]. Intraspecific aggression (mean=1.2667, std.deviation=0.55132) and aggression towards owners (mean=1.6315, std.deviation= 0.46795) scored low; these were not predicted by environmental conditions. Destructive behaviours (mean=1.7817, std.deviation=0.73428) showed weak positive correlations with the rabbits’ social environment.

Conclusions: Overall, the rabbits of this study appear to be kept under adequate conditions and scored low in aggressive or destructive behaviour. This suggests that improving housing conditions could prevent these behaviours in pet rabbits. However, rabbit behaviour was scored by a group of self-elected, highly attached rabbits owners, thus more studies are necessary.
rabbits, husbandry, welfare
42
European Society of Veterinary Clinical Ethology
Muser Leyvraz, A.
dbedb9a8-6cee-4606-90ad-e23eea3014ed
McBride, A .
8f13b829-a141-4b67-b2d7-08f839972646
Bishop, Felicity L.
1f5429c5-325f-4ac4-aae3-6ba85d079928
Muser Leyvraz, A.
dbedb9a8-6cee-4606-90ad-e23eea3014ed
McBride, A .
8f13b829-a141-4b67-b2d7-08f839972646
Bishop, Felicity L.
1f5429c5-325f-4ac4-aae3-6ba85d079928

Muser Leyvraz, A., McBride, A . and Bishop, Felicity L. (2009) Management and behaviour of pet rabbits in Switzerland. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the European Society of Veterinary Clinical Ethology & 5th Annual Meeting of the European College of Veterinary Behavioural Medicine-Companion Animals. European Society of Veterinary Clinical Ethology. p. 42 .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Introduction: Problem behaviour in pet rabbits may be related to inappropriate environments (McBride et al, 2004). Laboratory studies, e.g. Chi et al (2004) have shown a causal connection between management and behaviour change. The present study surveyed Swiss rabbit owners to investigate the relationship between husbandry and rabbit behaviour.

Methodology: Questionnaire data of housing, social grouping, feeding, exercise, interaction with owners and owner attachment (Zasloff, 1996) was collected. 21 Likert scale questions, such as ‘does your rabbit bite when being caressed?’ gave data of destructive, marking, affiliative and aggressive behaviour towards people and conspecifcs. 280 questionnaires were distributed to pet owners via veterinary surgeries in Switzerland. Data was analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS).

Results: 80 questionnaires were suitable for analysis. 98.8% of the pet rabbits were provided with hay, 96% with objects to chew. Most housing systems contained enrichment objects in addition to water or food bowls. 45% of the rabbits were kept inside the house or apartment, 55% outside. House rabbits were more frequently kept as single animals, the mean size of their housing systems was smaller, interactions with people were longer and consisted of more play and caressing. All respondents rated rabbit behaviour equally. Rabbit attachment behaviours scored high (mean=3.1918, std.deviation=1.070) and were positively correlated with owner attachment [r=0.389, p=0.002]. Intraspecific aggression (mean=1.2667, std.deviation=0.55132) and aggression towards owners (mean=1.6315, std.deviation= 0.46795) scored low; these were not predicted by environmental conditions. Destructive behaviours (mean=1.7817, std.deviation=0.73428) showed weak positive correlations with the rabbits’ social environment.

Conclusions: Overall, the rabbits of this study appear to be kept under adequate conditions and scored low in aggressive or destructive behaviour. This suggests that improving housing conditions could prevent these behaviours in pet rabbits. However, rabbit behaviour was scored by a group of self-elected, highly attached rabbits owners, thus more studies are necessary.

Text
Muser_leyvraz_ESCVE__Barcelona_2008.doc - Other
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: October 2009
Keywords: rabbits, husbandry, welfare

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 146503
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/146503
PURE UUID: ffe03f4d-1c21-4d18-a699-87a43a18da5c
ORCID for Felicity L. Bishop: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8737-6662

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Apr 2010 13:36
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:47

Export record

Contributors

Author: A. Muser Leyvraz
Author: A . McBride

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×