Police shootings and the role of tort

Steele, Jenny and Palmer, Philip (2008) Police shootings and the role of tort Modern Law Review, 71, (5), pp. 801-811. (doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2008.00716.x).


[img] PDF MLR_716.pdf - Version of Record
Download (132kB)


In Ashley v Chief Constable of Sussex, the House of Lords ruled that a civil claim in trespass to the person may be sustained against an individual police officer in respect of a fatal shooting, in circumstances where the officer had already been acquitted in criminal proceedings and where liability to compensate in respect of all losses had been conceded.

Two members of the majority clearly ruled that trespass torts may have a vindicatory purpose which survives a concession of liability to compensate, thus deepening the connection between tort, and the protection of fundamental rights, and suggesting an intriguing distinction between the functions of civil and criminal law.

Item Type: Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2008.00716.x
ISSNs: 0026-7961 (print)
Related URLs:
ePrint ID: 146653
Date :
Date Event
September 2008Published
Date Deposited: 22 Apr 2010 08:05
Last Modified: 18 Apr 2017 19:55
Further Information:Google Scholar
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/146653

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item