Preserving edits when perturbing microdata for statistical disclosure control
Preserving edits when perturbing microdata for statistical disclosure control
To protect individuals in microdata from the risk of re-identification, a general perturbative method called PRAM (the Post-Randomization Method) is sometimes used for masking records. This method adds “noise” to categorical variables by changing values of categories for a small number of records according to a prescribed probability matrix and a stochastic process based on the outcome of a random multinomial draw. Changing values of categorical variables, however, will cause fully edited and clean records in microdata to start failing edit constraints resulting in data of low utility. In addition, an inconsistent record pinpoints to a potential attacker that the record was perturbed and attempts can be made to unmask the data. Therefore, the perturbation process must take into account micro edit constraints which will ensure that perturbed microdata satisfy all edits. Macro edit constraints which take the form of information loss measures also need to be defined in order to ensure that the overall utility of the data will not be badly compromised given an acceptable level of disclosure risk. This paper will discuss methods for perturbing microdata using PRAM while minimizing micro and macro edit failures. (Updated 10th August 2005)
Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, University of Southampton
Shlomo, Natalie
e749febc-b7b9-4017-be48-96d59dd03215
De Waal, Ton
7d2c05de-fece-476c-bbf7-685f3c4b5221
25 February 2005
Shlomo, Natalie
e749febc-b7b9-4017-be48-96d59dd03215
De Waal, Ton
7d2c05de-fece-476c-bbf7-685f3c4b5221
Shlomo, Natalie and De Waal, Ton
(2005)
Preserving edits when perturbing microdata for statistical disclosure control
(S3RI Methodology Working Papers, M05/12)
Southampton, UK.
Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, University of Southampton
13pp.
Record type:
Monograph
(Working Paper)
Abstract
To protect individuals in microdata from the risk of re-identification, a general perturbative method called PRAM (the Post-Randomization Method) is sometimes used for masking records. This method adds “noise” to categorical variables by changing values of categories for a small number of records according to a prescribed probability matrix and a stochastic process based on the outcome of a random multinomial draw. Changing values of categorical variables, however, will cause fully edited and clean records in microdata to start failing edit constraints resulting in data of low utility. In addition, an inconsistent record pinpoints to a potential attacker that the record was perturbed and attempts can be made to unmask the data. Therefore, the perturbation process must take into account micro edit constraints which will ensure that perturbed microdata satisfy all edits. Macro edit constraints which take the form of information loss measures also need to be defined in order to ensure that the overall utility of the data will not be badly compromised given an acceptable level of disclosure risk. This paper will discuss methods for perturbing microdata using PRAM while minimizing micro and macro edit failures. (Updated 10th August 2005)
Text
14725-01.pdf
- Other
More information
Published date: 25 February 2005
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 14725
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/14725
PURE UUID: da83e0c3-6645-4ff4-82a4-554e13d3f77d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 25 Feb 2005
Last modified: 20 Feb 2024 03:20
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Natalie Shlomo
Author:
Ton De Waal
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics