The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Explaining temporal and spatial variation in soil moisture in a bare field using SAR imagery

Explaining temporal and spatial variation in soil moisture in a bare field using SAR imagery
Explaining temporal and spatial variation in soil moisture in a bare field using SAR imagery
Previous studies to determine the utility of satellite remote sensing for soil moisture monitoring have concentrated on field scale assessment. The European Remote Sensing satellites (ERS-1 and ERS-2) Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) instruments have a spatial resolution of less than 30 m in azimuth and 26 m in range, and potentially offer a considerably finer scale of soil moisture assessment. A series of soil moisture measurements were taken within a 15 ha bare field on the Essex (UK) coast at times to coincide with ERS-1 overpasses in the autumn and winter of 1995-96. This dataset has been used to investigate the ability of ERS-1 SAR backscatter response to detect spatial variation in soil moisture within the field. Analysis of variograms of SAR backscatter show that spatial variations in the ERS SAR data can be detected within the field and that spatial dependency increases when the soil is wet. Field measurements of soil moisture do not reflect these findings in quite the same way; during periods of low soil moisture content, the spatial variation of soil moisture cannot be easily characterized by the variograms. When the field is wet, spatial autocorrelation is more evident in the variograms. Regression analysis of paired observations of measured soil moisture and ERS SAR backscatter demonstrated that no significant relationship could be obtained for each day. However, when paired data for different dates were combined, a significant relationship between SAR backscatter and soil moisture could be obtained. The results suggest, therefore, that for this case study, soil moisture can be predicted at the field scale but not at the within-field/pixel scale.
0143-1161
3059-3074
Kelly, R.E.J.
8520a2e1-5a8b-46a5-b646-989411f1e8c2
Davie, T.J.A.
b0503bcd-0510-4b39-b43c-25e98734cacc
Atkinson, P.M.
aaaa51e4-a713-424f-92b0-0568b198f425
Kelly, R.E.J.
8520a2e1-5a8b-46a5-b646-989411f1e8c2
Davie, T.J.A.
b0503bcd-0510-4b39-b43c-25e98734cacc
Atkinson, P.M.
aaaa51e4-a713-424f-92b0-0568b198f425

Kelly, R.E.J., Davie, T.J.A. and Atkinson, P.M. (2003) Explaining temporal and spatial variation in soil moisture in a bare field using SAR imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24 (15), 3059-3074. (doi:10.1080/01431160110115771).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Previous studies to determine the utility of satellite remote sensing for soil moisture monitoring have concentrated on field scale assessment. The European Remote Sensing satellites (ERS-1 and ERS-2) Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) instruments have a spatial resolution of less than 30 m in azimuth and 26 m in range, and potentially offer a considerably finer scale of soil moisture assessment. A series of soil moisture measurements were taken within a 15 ha bare field on the Essex (UK) coast at times to coincide with ERS-1 overpasses in the autumn and winter of 1995-96. This dataset has been used to investigate the ability of ERS-1 SAR backscatter response to detect spatial variation in soil moisture within the field. Analysis of variograms of SAR backscatter show that spatial variations in the ERS SAR data can be detected within the field and that spatial dependency increases when the soil is wet. Field measurements of soil moisture do not reflect these findings in quite the same way; during periods of low soil moisture content, the spatial variation of soil moisture cannot be easily characterized by the variograms. When the field is wet, spatial autocorrelation is more evident in the variograms. Regression analysis of paired observations of measured soil moisture and ERS SAR backscatter demonstrated that no significant relationship could be obtained for each day. However, when paired data for different dates were combined, a significant relationship between SAR backscatter and soil moisture could be obtained. The results suggest, therefore, that for this case study, soil moisture can be predicted at the field scale but not at the within-field/pixel scale.

Text
Kelly_et_al_IJRS_2003.pdf - Other
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (397kB)

More information

Published date: 2003

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 14791
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/14791
ISSN: 0143-1161
PURE UUID: 8e252ef6-4bb4-4740-a4e4-1c571714d29c

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Mar 2005
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 05:31

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: R.E.J. Kelly
Author: T.J.A. Davie
Author: P.M. Atkinson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×