Transferred malice in tort law?

Beever, Allan (2009) Transferred malice in tort law? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 29, (3), pp. 400-420. (doi:10.1111/j.1748-121X.2009.00128.x).


[img] PDF TM.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (1MB)


Should the doctrine of transferred malice operate in the law of tort? Although there has been little written on this topic in England and Wales, it appears generally to have been accepted by academic commentators that the answer to this question is in the affirmative. Consequently, when the High Court in Bici v Ministry of Defence applied the doctrine to the tort of battery, most regarded this as unremarkable. This paper, however, argues that this position is mistaken: that the doctrine of transferred malice has, and can have, no place in the law of tort. The paper also examines the nature of intention operative in the law of trespass and its relationship with recklessness.

Item Type: Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi:10.1111/j.1748-121X.2009.00128.x
ISSNs: 0143-6503 (print)
ePrint ID: 147953
Date :
Date Event
September 2009Published
Date Deposited: 27 Apr 2010 09:02
Last Modified: 18 Apr 2017 14:35
Further Information:Google Scholar

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item