Diet, health and work intensity in England and Wales, 1800-1914
Diet, health and work intensity in England and Wales, 1800-1914
In their different ways, both Thomas Malthus and Thomas McKeown raised fundamental questions
about the relationship between food supply and the decline of mortality. Malthus argued that food
supply was the most important constraint on population growth and McKeown claimed that an improvement
in the population’s capacity to feed itself was the most important single cause of mortality change.
This paper explores the implications of these arguments for our understanding of the causes of mortality
decline in Britain between 1700 and 1914. It presents new estimates showing changes in the calorific
value and composition of British diets in 1700, 1750, 1800 and 1850 and compares these with the
official estimates published by the Royal Society in 1917. It then considers the implications of these
data in the light of new arguments about the relationship between diet, work intensity and economic
growth. However the paper is not solely concerned with the analysis of food-related issues. It also
considers the ways in which sanitary reform may have contributed to the decline of mortality at the
end of the nineteenth century and it pays particular attention to the impact of cohort-specific factors
on the pattern of mortality decline from the mid-nineteenth century onwards.
National Bureau of Economic Research
Harris, Bernard
4fb9402b-64f0-474b-b41f-a9ca34d4ff50
Floud, R.
f9dbb1ad-b76f-48f5-bd14-15cf8e4d174e
Fogel, R.W.
2f3d19a8-7465-481e-be83-97b367a22056
Hong, S.C.
8b6e8c26-beb7-4a72-8967-3f3056ce2b27
1 April 2010
Harris, Bernard
4fb9402b-64f0-474b-b41f-a9ca34d4ff50
Floud, R.
f9dbb1ad-b76f-48f5-bd14-15cf8e4d174e
Fogel, R.W.
2f3d19a8-7465-481e-be83-97b367a22056
Hong, S.C.
8b6e8c26-beb7-4a72-8967-3f3056ce2b27
Harris, Bernard, Floud, R., Fogel, R.W. and Hong, S.C.
(2010)
Diet, health and work intensity in England and Wales, 1800-1914
(NBER Working Papers Series, 15875)
Cambridge, US.
National Bureau of Economic Research
Record type:
Monograph
(Working Paper)
Abstract
In their different ways, both Thomas Malthus and Thomas McKeown raised fundamental questions
about the relationship between food supply and the decline of mortality. Malthus argued that food
supply was the most important constraint on population growth and McKeown claimed that an improvement
in the population’s capacity to feed itself was the most important single cause of mortality change.
This paper explores the implications of these arguments for our understanding of the causes of mortality
decline in Britain between 1700 and 1914. It presents new estimates showing changes in the calorific
value and composition of British diets in 1700, 1750, 1800 and 1850 and compares these with the
official estimates published by the Royal Society in 1917. It then considers the implications of these
data in the light of new arguments about the relationship between diet, work intensity and economic
growth. However the paper is not solely concerned with the analysis of food-related issues. It also
considers the ways in which sanitary reform may have contributed to the decline of mortality at the
end of the nineteenth century and it pays particular attention to the impact of cohort-specific factors
on the pattern of mortality decline from the mid-nineteenth century onwards.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 April 2010
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 148699
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/148699
PURE UUID: 7cc77438-3bcd-4212-b0be-c3849a1cbe6b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 28 Apr 2010 13:58
Last modified: 22 Jul 2022 17:21
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Bernard Harris
Author:
R. Floud
Author:
R.W. Fogel
Author:
S.C. Hong
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics