The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Is defined contribution a panacea for defined benefit social security funding problems? Lessons from two countries

Record type: Article

Many countries are changing their social security retirement program from defined benefit
(DB) to a defined contribution (DC) basis. Other countries such as the United States are
discussing the introduction of a defined contribution component. The replacement of a DB
social security retirement system by a DC system raises many important social and
economic issues. Thoughtful consideration must be given to the choice of criteria for
prioritizing objectives and outcomes, as well as in weighing the advantages and
disadvantages between different cohorts. For example, if any defined benefit obligations are
not fully funded at transition, a double burden will rest with transition generation(s).
Moreover, economists tend to assess the value of the system based on measures of economic
efficiency and the lack of impediments to a freely operating labour market. But such an
assessment may not give adequate recognition to factors such as individual wealth/poverty,
an individual’s ability to make optimal investment decisions, and transaction costs
associated with operating individual accounts. Indeed, some countries have suggested that
notional defined contribution (NDC) accounts may be the best way to address such issues.
Focusing on the adoption of a funded DC social security retirement program in Chile
and the adoption of a paygo NDC social security retirement program by Sweden, this
research identifies factors of financial markets, economics, and demographics necessary to
enable a move to DC accounts. In addition, it identifies the characteristics of the financial
markets that are necessary to support payments (wealth transfers) to retirees from a DC
social security retirement program.
The paper considers the questions of social security funding and plan type (DB vs. DC) and
attempts to assess the suitability of certain reform options for the United States. It approaches the
issue by trying to identify the features of each type and the strengths and weaknesses associated
with those features. A significant part of this analysis is the illustrative description of two realworld
plans, Chilean and Swedish. It then uses the theoretical considerations and the experience
of those plans to draw conclusions about reform proposals in the U.S., particularly the President’s
Commission to Strengthen Social Security Model 2.

PDF FINAL_IS_DC_A_PANACEA_ANDREWS_BROWN_100309.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Download (119kB)
Microsoft Word FINAL_IS_DC_A_PANACEA_ANDREWS_BROWN_100309.doc - Other
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (185kB)


Andrews, Doug and Brown, Robert L. (2009) Is defined contribution a panacea for defined benefit social security funding problems? Lessons from two countries North Amerian Actuarial Journal, 13, (2), pp. 186-201.

More information

Published date: April 2009
Organisations: Statistics


Local EPrints ID: 148881
ISSN: 1092-0277
PURE UUID: 2a141b48-3a4d-4624-906a-86a5feba0721

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Apr 2010 09:38
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 19:31

Export record


Author: Doug Andrews
Author: Robert L. Brown

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton:

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.