The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A comparative analysis of EC competition and US antitrust approaches to tying with special reference to economic thinking and intellectual property rights

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

The thesis analyses the EC competition and US antitrust approaches to tying with special reference to economic thinking and intellectual property rights. It establishes that from an economic perspective that tying cannot be considered purely anti-competitive. Only when certain conditions are present is this the case: market power, an imperfect tied product market, which includes insufficient competition, high barriers to entry, and competitors' inability to compete with the dominant company's tied product package. Even in these circumstances, tying may have pro-competitive effects, which can outweigh the anti-competitive effects. While in the EC, competition law has completely overtaken the dealings with tying, in the US the Patent Act has adopted a per se legality approach only condemning tying when the intellectual property owner holds market power and applies the tying arrangement together with the patent to extend his patent monopoly to staple products.
In comparison, competition law on both sides of the Atlantic see tying as (almost) illegal per se - almost because both jurisdictions require establishment of market power.
A similar four-step test has been applied in both the EC and the US:

1) market power in the tying product market
2) two separate products
3) anti-competitive effects on the tied product market
4) no objective justifications

By assessing these steps in detail, the thesis identifies that when dealing with more complex products, technologically integrated products and products protected by intellectual property rights, the four-step test is inadequate and will often result in a wrong conclusion. The thesis therefore proposes a new test, which takes into consideration economic thinking, the recent reform debate of Article 82 of the EC Treaty, which has proposed a more economic approach to exclusionary behaviour and the fact that intellectual property rights do not always confer market power and also attempts to create greater legal certainty to ensure that despite having market power a company can tie when the pro-competitive benefits outweigh the anti-competitive effects.

Full text not available from this repository.

Citation

Schmidt, Hedvig (2008) A comparative analysis of EC competition and US antitrust approaches to tying with special reference to economic thinking and intellectual property rights University of Essex, Department of Law, Doctoral Thesis , 449pp.

More information

Published date: August 2008
Additional Information: The thesis was published in 2009 under the title: “Competition Law, Innovation and Antitrust: an Analysis of Tying and Technological Integration” Edward Elgar 2009

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 148901
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/148901
PURE UUID: 43f78484-963a-495d-887b-4e55d04bcfe9

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Jun 2010 09:09
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 19:31

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×