The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Complements versus substitutes and trends in fertility choice in dynastic models

Jones, Larry E. and Schoonbroodt, Alice (2010) Complements versus substitutes and trends in fertility choice in dynastic models International Economic Review

Record type: Article


Demographers have long emphasized decreased mortality and `economic development' as the main contributors generating the demographic transition (DT). In economics, the Barro-Becker (BB) model of fertility choice, though simple and intuitive, has not been successful at reproducing changes in fertility in line with the demography literature---at least in its original formulation. We show that this is due to an implicit assumption that number and welfare of children are complements, a byproduct of high intertemporal elasticity of substitution (IES) typically assumed in the fertility literature.

Not only is this assumption not necessary, but qualitative and quantitative properties of the model in terms of fertility choice change dramatically when substitutability and low IES are assumed. These results do not require non-homotheticities or any other major changes to the basic BB model but emphasize productivity growth rates as opposed to income levels to interpret `economic development.'

We find that with an IES of one-third, model predictions of changes in fertility amount to two-thirds of those observed in U.S. data since 1800. The increase in productivity growth accounts for 90 percent of the predicted fall in fertility before 1880; and changes in mortality account for 90 percent of the predicted fall from 1880 to 1990.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: August 2010
Keywords: fertility choice, substitutes, demographic changes


Local EPrints ID: 150063
ISSN: 0020-6598
PURE UUID: 44f2a12c-18ad-4645-9a62-bd4e61e8a586

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 May 2010 09:02
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 19:22

Export record


Author: Larry E. Jones
Author: Alice Schoonbroodt

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton:

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.