Fertility theories: can they explain the negative fertility-income relationship?
Fertility theories: can they explain the negative fertility-income relationship?
In this chapter we revisit the relationship between income and fertility. There is overwhelming empirical evidence that fertility is negatively related to income in most countries at most times. Several theories have been proposed in the literature to explain this somewhat puzzling fact. The most common one is based on the opportunity cost of time being higher for individuals with higher earnings. Alternatively, people might differ in their desire to procreate and accordingly some people invest more in children and less in market-specific human capital and thus have lower earnings. We revisit these and other possible explanations. We find that these theories arenot as robust as is commonly believed. That is, several special assumptions are needed to generate the negative relationship. Not all assumptions are equally plausible. Such findings will be useful to distinguish alternative theories. We conclude that further research along these lines is needed.
77
National Bureau of Economic Research
Jones, Larry E.
c23ebdbc-fa09-473b-8e28-693fe6a94248
Schoonbroodt, Alice
9e83bf4e-5e95-4e7b-9f3e-d6cbb8adc64b
Tertilt, Michele
6731af9c-c4f6-4424-9a00-cea61d951e3d
August 2010
Jones, Larry E.
c23ebdbc-fa09-473b-8e28-693fe6a94248
Schoonbroodt, Alice
9e83bf4e-5e95-4e7b-9f3e-d6cbb8adc64b
Tertilt, Michele
6731af9c-c4f6-4424-9a00-cea61d951e3d
Jones, Larry E., Schoonbroodt, Alice and Tertilt, Michele
(2010)
Fertility theories: can they explain the negative fertility-income relationship?
Shoven, John B.
(ed.)
In Demography and the Economy.
National Bureau of Economic Research.
.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
In this chapter we revisit the relationship between income and fertility. There is overwhelming empirical evidence that fertility is negatively related to income in most countries at most times. Several theories have been proposed in the literature to explain this somewhat puzzling fact. The most common one is based on the opportunity cost of time being higher for individuals with higher earnings. Alternatively, people might differ in their desire to procreate and accordingly some people invest more in children and less in market-specific human capital and thus have lower earnings. We revisit these and other possible explanations. We find that these theories arenot as robust as is commonly believed. That is, several special assumptions are needed to generate the negative relationship. Not all assumptions are equally plausible. Such findings will be useful to distinguish alternative theories. We conclude that further research along these lines is needed.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: August 2010
Venue - Dates:
NBER Conference, 2008-04-11 - 2008-04-12
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 150067
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/150067
PURE UUID: 3e07102c-1e44-40be-b215-2870d594ab02
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 May 2010 11:04
Last modified: 09 Apr 2024 16:29
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Larry E. Jones
Author:
Alice Schoonbroodt
Author:
Michele Tertilt
Editor:
John B. Shoven
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics