How legitimate is the open method of coordination?
How legitimate is the open method of coordination?
This article argues that the OMC's legitimacy can be improved only by strengthening parliamentary channels of input-legitimacy since output-legitimacy alone is inappropriate and cannot be achieved without input-legitimacy. In addition, concepts and practices of direct 'stakeholder' participation currently applied within the OMC are insufficient in strengthening input-legitimacy.
765-786
Büchs, Milena
c62b4fbd-660c-4642-876e-de9512db9a9c
September 2008
Büchs, Milena
c62b4fbd-660c-4642-876e-de9512db9a9c
Abstract
This article argues that the OMC's legitimacy can be improved only by strengthening parliamentary channels of input-legitimacy since output-legitimacy alone is inappropriate and cannot be achieved without input-legitimacy. In addition, concepts and practices of direct 'stakeholder' participation currently applied within the OMC are insufficient in strengthening input-legitimacy.
Text
jcms_804_poofs_June_2008.pdf
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 11 August 2008
Published date: September 2008
Organisations:
Sociology & Social Policy
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 150777
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/150777
ISSN: 0021-9886
PURE UUID: 57a1180e-dd48-4a74-b60a-78c570f3d295
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 May 2010 11:35
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 01:18
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Milena Büchs
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics