The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy: a comparative study

Abu Hilal, M., McPhail, M.J.W., Zeidan, B., Zeidan, S., Hallam, M.J., Armstrong, T., Primrose, J.N. and Pearce, N.W. (2008) Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy: a comparative study European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 34, (12), pp. 1285-1288. (doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2008.01.018).

Record type: Article


Background: laparoscopic liver surgery has been difficult to popularize. High volume liver centres have identified left lateral sectionectomy (LLS) as a procedure with potential for transformation into a primarily laparoscopic procedure where surgeons can safely gain proficiency.

Methods: forty-four patients underwent either laparoscopic (LLLS) or open (OLLS) left lateral sectionectomy (of segments II/III) for focal lesions at Southampton General Hospital.

Results: OLLS and LLLS groups were matched for age, sex and tumour types resected. Median operative time in the LLLS group was 180 (40-340) min and 155 (110-330) min in the OLLS group (p=0.885) with median intra-operative blood loss in the LLLS group 80 (25-800) ml versus a larger 470 (100-3000) ml; p=0.002 for patients receiving OLLS. Post-operative stay was also shorter in the LLLS group (3.5 (1-6) days) compared to the OLLS group (7 (3-12) days; p<0.001). Resection margin was not different in the two groups (11 (1.5-30) mm (LLLS) versus 12 (4-40) mm (OLLS); p=1) and neither was the complication rate (13% for LLLS versus 25% for OLLS; p=0.541). There were no conversions to open in the LLLS group and no deaths in either group at 90 days. Between the first and second 12 LLLS the median operative time fell from 240 (70-340) min to 120 (40-120) min; p=0.005 as well as median post-operative hospital stay from 4.5 (2-6) days to 2 (1-4) days, p=0.001.

Conclusion: LLLS is a viable alternative to OLLS with potential improvements in intra-operative blood loss and shorter hospital stay without adversely affecting successful resection or complication rates. Larger prospective studies are required to explore this new avenue in laparoscopic liver surgery.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: December 2008
Keywords: laparoscopic liver surgery, left lateral secienectomy, laparoscopic vs open


Local EPrints ID: 150935
ISSN: 0748-7983
PURE UUID: 851320c8-7b58-4112-adb0-ce6ec6e5f88f
ORCID for J.N. Primrose: ORCID iD

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 May 2010 15:51
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 12:56

Export record



Author: M. Abu Hilal
Author: M.J.W. McPhail
Author: B. Zeidan
Author: S. Zeidan
Author: M.J. Hallam
Author: T. Armstrong
Author: J.N. Primrose ORCID iD
Author: N.W. Pearce

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton:

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.