The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Is the use of an additional pace/sense lead the optimal strategy for the avoidance of lead extraction in defibrillation lead failure? a single-centre experience

Is the use of an additional pace/sense lead the optimal strategy for the avoidance of lead extraction in defibrillation lead failure? a single-centre experience
Is the use of an additional pace/sense lead the optimal strategy for the avoidance of lead extraction in defibrillation lead failure? a single-centre experience
Aims - The implantation of an additional pace-sense (P/S) lead is a standard treatment option in the management of an isolated pace-sense problem in a defibrillation (HV-P/S) lead. However, the safety of this management strategy is unclear. We performed a retrospective single-centre study to assess this.

Methods - and results We studied all patients with an isolated P/S problem in an HV-P/S lead, treated with an additional P/S lead, in our institution. The need for further invasive intervention for a lead-related complication, or death during follow-up, was assessed. From 2000 to 2008, 45 patients were treated with an additional P/S lead. Mean follow-up was 78 ± 38 months from original device implantation and 28 ± 17 months following implantation of the additional lead. During follow-up, three patients required an invasive intervention for a lead-related problem. All were successfully treated with lead extraction and device re-implantation. There were five deaths. Following implant of an additional lead, cumulative survival from further lead defects after 6 months, 1, 2, and 3 years was 100, 100, 93, and 87%, respectively.

Conclusion - In the treatment of an isolated P/S problem in an HV-P/S lead, the placement of an additional P/S lead is a safe management strategy, at least in the short term
implantable cardioverter defibrillators, lead, failure, complications, defibrillation
1099-5129
522-526
Scott, Paul A.
5a16b1f4-74d3-473f-9eeb-c2a823d690dc
Chungh, Aman
8f6ab764-8839-4795-8625-efc7d414182a
Zeb, Mahmood
ae7aaa73-13ac-4d40-b211-60d9b225c1fa
Yue, Arthur M.
4040f8ec-0252-49e0-b838-58f37956acd2
Roberts, Paul R.
193431e8-f9d5-48d6-8f62-ed9052b2571d
Morgan, John M.
ac98099e-241d-4551-bc98-709f6dfc8680
Scott, Paul A.
5a16b1f4-74d3-473f-9eeb-c2a823d690dc
Chungh, Aman
8f6ab764-8839-4795-8625-efc7d414182a
Zeb, Mahmood
ae7aaa73-13ac-4d40-b211-60d9b225c1fa
Yue, Arthur M.
4040f8ec-0252-49e0-b838-58f37956acd2
Roberts, Paul R.
193431e8-f9d5-48d6-8f62-ed9052b2571d
Morgan, John M.
ac98099e-241d-4551-bc98-709f6dfc8680

Scott, Paul A., Chungh, Aman, Zeb, Mahmood, Yue, Arthur M., Roberts, Paul R. and Morgan, John M. (2009) Is the use of an additional pace/sense lead the optimal strategy for the avoidance of lead extraction in defibrillation lead failure? a single-centre experience. Europace, 12 (4), 522-526. (doi:10.1093/europace/eup406).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Aims - The implantation of an additional pace-sense (P/S) lead is a standard treatment option in the management of an isolated pace-sense problem in a defibrillation (HV-P/S) lead. However, the safety of this management strategy is unclear. We performed a retrospective single-centre study to assess this.

Methods - and results We studied all patients with an isolated P/S problem in an HV-P/S lead, treated with an additional P/S lead, in our institution. The need for further invasive intervention for a lead-related complication, or death during follow-up, was assessed. From 2000 to 2008, 45 patients were treated with an additional P/S lead. Mean follow-up was 78 ± 38 months from original device implantation and 28 ± 17 months following implantation of the additional lead. During follow-up, three patients required an invasive intervention for a lead-related problem. All were successfully treated with lead extraction and device re-implantation. There were five deaths. Following implant of an additional lead, cumulative survival from further lead defects after 6 months, 1, 2, and 3 years was 100, 100, 93, and 87%, respectively.

Conclusion - In the treatment of an isolated P/S problem in an HV-P/S lead, the placement of an additional P/S lead is a safe management strategy, at least in the short term

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 24 December 2009
Keywords: implantable cardioverter defibrillators, lead, failure, complications, defibrillation

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 151035
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/151035
ISSN: 1099-5129
PURE UUID: 77a0a9da-da7e-478a-96cd-239ee154cf2d

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 May 2010 08:40
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 01:19

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Paul A. Scott
Author: Aman Chungh
Author: Mahmood Zeb
Author: Arthur M. Yue
Author: Paul R. Roberts
Author: John M. Morgan

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×