The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Historians for the right to work: we demand a continuing supply of history

Historians for the right to work: we demand a continuing supply of history
Historians for the right to work: we demand a continuing supply of history
Nearly thirty years on from the second heightened phase of the nuclear arms race, science is informing of us of a new self-induced threat to our very existence on this planet, this time through anthropogenic climate change. This article seeks to make a link between the two threats and the way they have been presented to a wider public by elite policy makers and opinion formers.

Back in 1980 Sir Michael Howard, a leading war historian, proposed that if the nuclear (weapons) ante was to be upped, greater civil defence was its necessary corollary. In our present moment Sir David King, formerly chief scientific adviser to Her Majesty’s Government, has proposed a ‘solution’ to the upping of carbon emissions, through more ‘big’ technology, especially in the form of ‘nuclear’ power.

In both instances it is significant that alternative ways of thinking – and with them lines of action – have been implicitly marginalized or ruled out of the equation, King going so far as to attack opponents to his position as Luddites. Deferring to ‘those who know best’ is the default position of modern society as it attempts to grapple with complex as well as frightening problems. But could looking at history, not least the history we associate with ‘Luddism’, offer us the basis for a lateral consideration of ‘the mess we are in’, indeed a critical and purposeful unravelling of how we arrived here? We propose our guide in this quest to be the late Edward (E. P.) Thompson, who would, we venture, were he today alive, have taken up the cudgels on behalf of grass-roots empowerment in the face of global warming, just as he did in his 1980 Protest and Survive riposte to Howard’s essential acceptance of the nuclear arms race. Underlying this argument are some basic questions which are fundamental to the future of home sapiens as we peer into a perilous future.

Who decides how society should respond to crisis? Must we always defer to the scientific keepers of the keys to the kingdom or might we be better served by looking back into a recent and indeed deeper history to find autonomous ways of living which can genuinely create the basis for a long-term, less violent survivability and resilient sustainability of the human Oikumene?

Fundamental to this argument is the premise that the post-Enlightenment mantras of those who remain wedded to a political economy of ‘business as usual’ can no longer suffice and that historians, and other students of the past, could have a significant role to play in offering alternatives from outside the conventional box. Whether this can be of benefit to policy makers needs discussion, always with a view to the needs of the commonweal. It is this which has motivated the creation of Rescue!
1363-3554
69-81
Levene, Mark
4ad83ded-d4b9-40eb-a795-b2382a9a296a
Levene, Mark
4ad83ded-d4b9-40eb-a795-b2382a9a296a

Levene, Mark (2009) Historians for the right to work: we demand a continuing supply of history. History Workshop Journal, 67 (1), 69-81. (doi:10.1093/hwj/dbn063).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Nearly thirty years on from the second heightened phase of the nuclear arms race, science is informing of us of a new self-induced threat to our very existence on this planet, this time through anthropogenic climate change. This article seeks to make a link between the two threats and the way they have been presented to a wider public by elite policy makers and opinion formers.

Back in 1980 Sir Michael Howard, a leading war historian, proposed that if the nuclear (weapons) ante was to be upped, greater civil defence was its necessary corollary. In our present moment Sir David King, formerly chief scientific adviser to Her Majesty’s Government, has proposed a ‘solution’ to the upping of carbon emissions, through more ‘big’ technology, especially in the form of ‘nuclear’ power.

In both instances it is significant that alternative ways of thinking – and with them lines of action – have been implicitly marginalized or ruled out of the equation, King going so far as to attack opponents to his position as Luddites. Deferring to ‘those who know best’ is the default position of modern society as it attempts to grapple with complex as well as frightening problems. But could looking at history, not least the history we associate with ‘Luddism’, offer us the basis for a lateral consideration of ‘the mess we are in’, indeed a critical and purposeful unravelling of how we arrived here? We propose our guide in this quest to be the late Edward (E. P.) Thompson, who would, we venture, were he today alive, have taken up the cudgels on behalf of grass-roots empowerment in the face of global warming, just as he did in his 1980 Protest and Survive riposte to Howard’s essential acceptance of the nuclear arms race. Underlying this argument are some basic questions which are fundamental to the future of home sapiens as we peer into a perilous future.

Who decides how society should respond to crisis? Must we always defer to the scientific keepers of the keys to the kingdom or might we be better served by looking back into a recent and indeed deeper history to find autonomous ways of living which can genuinely create the basis for a long-term, less violent survivability and resilient sustainability of the human Oikumene?

Fundamental to this argument is the premise that the post-Enlightenment mantras of those who remain wedded to a political economy of ‘business as usual’ can no longer suffice and that historians, and other students of the past, could have a significant role to play in offering alternatives from outside the conventional box. Whether this can be of benefit to policy makers needs discussion, always with a view to the needs of the commonweal. It is this which has motivated the creation of Rescue!

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2009

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 151177
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/151177
ISSN: 1363-3554
PURE UUID: c2c3f4b2-8b47-4585-9f86-878ea6c591f2

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 May 2010 08:17
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 01:19

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×