The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Rawlsian theory and the circumstances of politics

Rawlsian theory and the circumstances of politics
Rawlsian theory and the circumstances of politics
Can Rawlsian theory provide us with an adequate response to the practical question of how we should proceed in the face of widespread and intractable disagreement over matters of justice? Recent criticism of ideal theorizing might make us wonder whether this question highlights another way in which ideal theory can be too far removed from our non-ideal circumstances to provide any practical guidance. Further reflection on it does not show that ideal theory is redundant, but it does indicate that there is a need for a nonideal theory that does not consist simply in an account of how to apply the principles which are yielded by ideal theory to non-ideal circumstances in the light of what is feasible and an assessment of the costs of implementation. Indeed any non-ideal theory that can adequately address this question will have to be partially autonomous, drawing on a notion of legitimacy that is rather different to the one which lies at the heart of Rawlsian ideal theory.
rawls, justice, legitimacy, disagreement
0090-5917
658-683
Mason, Andrew
6e0103d9-267a-456c-9150-256c588a5107
Mason, Andrew
6e0103d9-267a-456c-9150-256c588a5107

Mason, Andrew (2010) Rawlsian theory and the circumstances of politics. Political Theory, 38 (5), 658-683. (doi:10.1177/0090591710372862).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Can Rawlsian theory provide us with an adequate response to the practical question of how we should proceed in the face of widespread and intractable disagreement over matters of justice? Recent criticism of ideal theorizing might make us wonder whether this question highlights another way in which ideal theory can be too far removed from our non-ideal circumstances to provide any practical guidance. Further reflection on it does not show that ideal theory is redundant, but it does indicate that there is a need for a nonideal theory that does not consist simply in an account of how to apply the principles which are yielded by ideal theory to non-ideal circumstances in the light of what is feasible and an assessment of the costs of implementation. Indeed any non-ideal theory that can adequately address this question will have to be partially autonomous, drawing on a notion of legitimacy that is rather different to the one which lies at the heart of Rawlsian ideal theory.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: October 2010
Keywords: rawls, justice, legitimacy, disagreement

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 151769
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/151769
ISSN: 0090-5917
PURE UUID: 8e380b01-0dc5-4279-aa66-f2bf5732398f

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 May 2010 13:18
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 01:21

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Andrew Mason

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×