Rawlsian theory and the circumstances of politics

Mason, Andrew (2010) Rawlsian theory and the circumstances of politics Political Theory, 38, (5), pp. 658-683. (doi:10.1177/0090591710372862).


Full text not available from this repository.


Can Rawlsian theory provide us with an adequate response to the practical question of how we should proceed in the face of widespread and intractable disagreement over matters of justice? Recent criticism of ideal theorizing might make us wonder whether this question highlights another way in which ideal theory can be too far removed from our non-ideal circumstances to provide any practical guidance. Further reflection on it does not show that ideal theory is redundant, but it does indicate that there is a need for a nonideal theory that does not consist simply in an account of how to apply the principles which are yielded by ideal theory to non-ideal circumstances in the light of what is feasible and an assessment of the costs of implementation. Indeed any non-ideal theory that can adequately address this question will have to be partially autonomous, drawing on a notion of legitimacy that is rather different to the one which lies at the heart of Rawlsian ideal theory.

Item Type: Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi:10.1177/0090591710372862
ISSNs: 1470-8914 (print)
Keywords: rawls, justice, legitimacy, disagreement

ePrint ID: 151769
Date :
Date Event
October 2010Published
Date Deposited: 12 May 2010 13:18
Last Modified: 18 Apr 2017 04:20
Further Information:Google Scholar
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/151769

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item