'Working the system'. Achieving change through partnership working: an evaluation of cancer partnership groups
'Working the system'. Achieving change through partnership working: an evaluation of cancer partnership groups
Aims and objectives: to investigate the characteristics and achievements of cancer partnership groups – collaborative service improvement groups formed of NHS staff and service users – in the 34 cancer networks in England, and in particular to explore the influence that such groups had on local cancer services.
Design: a qualitative approach employing a structured telephone survey, face-to-face interviews and documentary analysis.
Participants and setting: thirty cancer networks in England with an active Partnership Group completed the telephone survey. From these 30 networks, six networks were subsequently selected from which service users and NHS professionals involved in partnership groups and NHS professionals who were non-members were recruited to take part in face-to-face interviews.
Results and conclusions: partnership groups were established in the majority of cancer networks. Typically, these groups were at network level, been established for less than a year, met once every 2 months, and were populated with both service users and health-care professionals. Five common activities and achievements were identified: establishment of the group itself; acting as a 'reference' group for consultation; networking and representation on other groups; patient information and communication and proactive influencing. Activities progressed in scale and complexity as groups evolved. Groups had learnt the basics of change management and some identified a more sophisticated understanding of change processes in the NHS as essential for the group's motivation and survival. When gauging the impact of involvement strategies it would seem important to subscribe to broad indicators of success that include both process and outcome measures
cancer services, evaluative, patient and public involvement, user involvement
210-220
Richardson, Alison
3db30680-aa47-43a5-b54d-62d10ece17b7
Sitzia, John
7aa099da-5f90-4e28-878d-c3041d6b33ca
Cotterell, Phil
34ced262-73fd-4635-ba0d-82fdf5c58fa2
September 2005
Richardson, Alison
3db30680-aa47-43a5-b54d-62d10ece17b7
Sitzia, John
7aa099da-5f90-4e28-878d-c3041d6b33ca
Cotterell, Phil
34ced262-73fd-4635-ba0d-82fdf5c58fa2
Richardson, Alison, Sitzia, John and Cotterell, Phil
(2005)
'Working the system'. Achieving change through partnership working: an evaluation of cancer partnership groups.
Health Expectations, 8 (3), .
(doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00332.x).
Abstract
Aims and objectives: to investigate the characteristics and achievements of cancer partnership groups – collaborative service improvement groups formed of NHS staff and service users – in the 34 cancer networks in England, and in particular to explore the influence that such groups had on local cancer services.
Design: a qualitative approach employing a structured telephone survey, face-to-face interviews and documentary analysis.
Participants and setting: thirty cancer networks in England with an active Partnership Group completed the telephone survey. From these 30 networks, six networks were subsequently selected from which service users and NHS professionals involved in partnership groups and NHS professionals who were non-members were recruited to take part in face-to-face interviews.
Results and conclusions: partnership groups were established in the majority of cancer networks. Typically, these groups were at network level, been established for less than a year, met once every 2 months, and were populated with both service users and health-care professionals. Five common activities and achievements were identified: establishment of the group itself; acting as a 'reference' group for consultation; networking and representation on other groups; patient information and communication and proactive influencing. Activities progressed in scale and complexity as groups evolved. Groups had learnt the basics of change management and some identified a more sophisticated understanding of change processes in the NHS as essential for the group's motivation and survival. When gauging the impact of involvement strategies it would seem important to subscribe to broad indicators of success that include both process and outcome measures
Text
Richardson_Sitzia_Cotterell_PPE_HEX_2005.pdf
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: September 2005
Keywords:
cancer services, evaluative, patient and public involvement, user involvement
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 154193
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/154193
ISSN: 1369-6513
PURE UUID: 18e262af-1e02-422a-8534-cf3430737e0f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 01 Jul 2010 14:18
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:55
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
John Sitzia
Author:
Phil Cotterell
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics