The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Information needs and preferences of low and high literacy consumers for decisions about colorectal cancer screening: utilizing a linguistic model

Information needs and preferences of low and high literacy consumers for decisions about colorectal cancer screening: utilizing a linguistic model
Information needs and preferences of low and high literacy consumers for decisions about colorectal cancer screening: utilizing a linguistic model
Context The use of written decision aids (DAs) in clinical practice has
proliferated. However, few DAs have been developed for low literacy
users, despite this group having low knowledge about healthcare and
lacking involvement in health decisions.
Objective To explore the information needs and understanding of adults
with varying literacy in relation to colorectal cancer screening, and
to consider their responses to two versions of a decision aid.
Participants Thirty-three men and women aged 45-74 years were recruited
from Adult Basic Education classes (n = 17) and University Continuing
Education programs (n = 16).
Methods We used qualitative methods (in-depth, semi-structured
interviews) to compare and contrast the views of adults with lower and
higher literacy levels, to gain a better understanding of how people
with lower literacy value and interpret specific DA content and
components; and determine whether needs and preferences are specific to
lower literacy groups or generic across the broad literacy spectrum.
Results Regardless of literacy perspective, participants'
interpretations of the DA were shaped by their prior knowledge and
expectations, as well as their values and preferences. This influenced
perceptions of the DAs role in supporting informed decision making. A
linguistic theoretical model was applied to interpret the findings.
This facilitated considerations beyond the traditional focus on the
readability of materials.
Conclusion Decision aids developers may find it useful to apply
alternative approaches (linguistic) when creating DAs for consumers of
varying literacy.
1369-6513
123-136
Smith, Sian K
f003c78f-69b9-4578-a1a9-26f94ea80a11
Trevena, Lyndal
0eeb2f6f-e14f-4a33-aa2b-ac7922562217
Nutbeam, Donald
352dc808-9160-42e7-8b52-b8cac02ad486
Barratt, Alexandra
d2bb9788-bd83-4971-870d-c651fb660e6e
McCaffery, Kirsten J
732737ce-bb06-4231-b40c-e3d080066918
Smith, Sian K
f003c78f-69b9-4578-a1a9-26f94ea80a11
Trevena, Lyndal
0eeb2f6f-e14f-4a33-aa2b-ac7922562217
Nutbeam, Donald
352dc808-9160-42e7-8b52-b8cac02ad486
Barratt, Alexandra
d2bb9788-bd83-4971-870d-c651fb660e6e
McCaffery, Kirsten J
732737ce-bb06-4231-b40c-e3d080066918

Smith, Sian K, Trevena, Lyndal, Nutbeam, Donald, Barratt, Alexandra and McCaffery, Kirsten J (2008) Information needs and preferences of low and high literacy consumers for decisions about colorectal cancer screening: utilizing a linguistic model. Health Expectations, 11 (2), 123-136. (doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00489.x).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Context The use of written decision aids (DAs) in clinical practice has
proliferated. However, few DAs have been developed for low literacy
users, despite this group having low knowledge about healthcare and
lacking involvement in health decisions.
Objective To explore the information needs and understanding of adults
with varying literacy in relation to colorectal cancer screening, and
to consider their responses to two versions of a decision aid.
Participants Thirty-three men and women aged 45-74 years were recruited
from Adult Basic Education classes (n = 17) and University Continuing
Education programs (n = 16).
Methods We used qualitative methods (in-depth, semi-structured
interviews) to compare and contrast the views of adults with lower and
higher literacy levels, to gain a better understanding of how people
with lower literacy value and interpret specific DA content and
components; and determine whether needs and preferences are specific to
lower literacy groups or generic across the broad literacy spectrum.
Results Regardless of literacy perspective, participants'
interpretations of the DA were shaped by their prior knowledge and
expectations, as well as their values and preferences. This influenced
perceptions of the DAs role in supporting informed decision making. A
linguistic theoretical model was applied to interpret the findings.
This facilitated considerations beyond the traditional focus on the
readability of materials.
Conclusion Decision aids developers may find it useful to apply
alternative approaches (linguistic) when creating DAs for consumers of
varying literacy.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: June 2008

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 154683
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/154683
ISSN: 1369-6513
PURE UUID: 47594374-d81f-432c-8766-6204c25e9e1c

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 May 2010 08:39
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 01:34

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sian K Smith
Author: Lyndal Trevena
Author: Donald Nutbeam
Author: Alexandra Barratt
Author: Kirsten J McCaffery

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×