The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Varying responses of insect herbivores to altered plant chemistry under organic and conventional treatments

Varying responses of insect herbivores to altered plant chemistry under organic and conventional treatments
Varying responses of insect herbivores to altered plant chemistry under organic and conventional treatments
The hypothesis that plants supplied with organic fertilizers are better defended against insect herbivores than those supplied with synthetic fertilizers was tested over two field seasons. Organic and synthetic fertilizer treatments at two nitrogen concentrations were supplied to Brassica plants, and their effects on the abundance of herbivore species and plant chemistry were assessed. The organic treatments also differed in fertilizer type: a green manure was used for the low-nitrogen treatment, while the high-nitrogen treatment contained green and animal manures. Two aphid species showed different responses to fertilizers: the Brassica specialist Brevicoryne brassicae was more abundant on organically fertilized plants, while the generalist Myzus persicae had higher populations on synthetically fertilized plants. The diamondback moth Plutella xylostella (a crucifer specialist) was more abundant on synthetically fertilized plants and preferred to oviposit on these plants. Glucosinolate concentrations were up to three times greater on plants grown in the organic treatments, while foliar nitrogen was maximized on plants under the higher of the synthetic fertilizer treatments. The varying response of herbivore species to these strong differences in plant chemistry demonstrates that hypotheses on defence in organically grown crops have over-simplified the response of phytophagous insects.
agro-ecology, brassica oleracea var. capitata, glucobrassicin, nitrogen, sinigrin, sustainable agriculture
0962-8452
779-786
Staley, Joanna T.
c7314879-8aff-4186-85d0-8d293dee1dc2
Stewart-Jones, Alex
f454f616-6ebe-4866-9169-52e0bbb61317
Pope, Tom W.
6d705af0-ba02-4592-95ce-d24100563cde
Wright, Denis J.
ffc2d14b-c34e-4977-a0f3-6dee89cb7c3a
Leather, Simon R.
645d5023-a226-43e2-aab0-503922d80eee
Hadley, Paul
c3d7cb33-f00e-4f9b-b12a-7c2f7c3ac1d3
Rossiter, John T.
1e72f754-2148-46e0-965a-1c06caa4275a
van Emden, Helmut F.
2407b7f5-e7c9-4916-ba58-6cd50ebda1e9
Poppy, Guy M.
e18524cf-10ae-4ab4-b50c-e73e7d841389
Staley, Joanna T.
c7314879-8aff-4186-85d0-8d293dee1dc2
Stewart-Jones, Alex
f454f616-6ebe-4866-9169-52e0bbb61317
Pope, Tom W.
6d705af0-ba02-4592-95ce-d24100563cde
Wright, Denis J.
ffc2d14b-c34e-4977-a0f3-6dee89cb7c3a
Leather, Simon R.
645d5023-a226-43e2-aab0-503922d80eee
Hadley, Paul
c3d7cb33-f00e-4f9b-b12a-7c2f7c3ac1d3
Rossiter, John T.
1e72f754-2148-46e0-965a-1c06caa4275a
van Emden, Helmut F.
2407b7f5-e7c9-4916-ba58-6cd50ebda1e9
Poppy, Guy M.
e18524cf-10ae-4ab4-b50c-e73e7d841389

Staley, Joanna T., Stewart-Jones, Alex, Pope, Tom W., Wright, Denis J., Leather, Simon R., Hadley, Paul, Rossiter, John T., van Emden, Helmut F. and Poppy, Guy M. (2009) Varying responses of insect herbivores to altered plant chemistry under organic and conventional treatments. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277 (1682), 779-786. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1631).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The hypothesis that plants supplied with organic fertilizers are better defended against insect herbivores than those supplied with synthetic fertilizers was tested over two field seasons. Organic and synthetic fertilizer treatments at two nitrogen concentrations were supplied to Brassica plants, and their effects on the abundance of herbivore species and plant chemistry were assessed. The organic treatments also differed in fertilizer type: a green manure was used for the low-nitrogen treatment, while the high-nitrogen treatment contained green and animal manures. Two aphid species showed different responses to fertilizers: the Brassica specialist Brevicoryne brassicae was more abundant on organically fertilized plants, while the generalist Myzus persicae had higher populations on synthetically fertilized plants. The diamondback moth Plutella xylostella (a crucifer specialist) was more abundant on synthetically fertilized plants and preferred to oviposit on these plants. Glucosinolate concentrations were up to three times greater on plants grown in the organic treatments, while foliar nitrogen was maximized on plants under the higher of the synthetic fertilizer treatments. The varying response of herbivore species to these strong differences in plant chemistry demonstrates that hypotheses on defence in organically grown crops have over-simplified the response of phytophagous insects.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 11 November 2009
Keywords: agro-ecology, brassica oleracea var. capitata, glucobrassicin, nitrogen, sinigrin, sustainable agriculture
Organisations: Biological Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 155389
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/155389
ISSN: 0962-8452
PURE UUID: bc8e9ca7-a632-4b37-855a-d7ca0b5074b7

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 May 2010 14:32
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 01:38

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Joanna T. Staley
Author: Alex Stewart-Jones
Author: Tom W. Pope
Author: Denis J. Wright
Author: Simon R. Leather
Author: Paul Hadley
Author: John T. Rossiter
Author: Helmut F. van Emden
Author: Guy M. Poppy

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×