On estimating the atmospheric longwave flux at the ocean surface from ship meteorological reports.
On estimating the atmospheric longwave flux at the ocean surface from ship meteorological reports.
The accuracy to which the atmospheric component of the longwave flux at the ocean surface can be estimated by using simple empirical formulae, with information from standard ship meteorological reports as input, has been tested by comparison with radiometric measurements made on cruises in the midlatitude North Atlantic and the Southern Ocean. Over a wide range of atmospheric conditions the best agreement between the estimated and measured downwelling longwave flux is obtained by using the formula of Clark et al. [1974], which has a mean bias error with respect to our combined data set of ?0.7 W/m2. Two other formulae were considered: the Bunker [1976] formula, which is found to overestimate the atmospheric longwave flux at values less than about 350 W/m2, resulting in an overall bias of 9.4 W/m2, and the Bignami et al. [1995] formula, which underestimates the flux over the entire range considered, giving a bias of ?26.5W/m2. The difference in performance of the Clark and Bunker formulae is ascribed to the different parameterizations assumed for the effect of clouds and atmospheric humidity on the longwave flux. It is suggested that the Clark formula be used in future climatological studies at midlatitudes.
27961-27972
Josey, S.A.
2252ab7f-5cd2-49fd-a951-aece44553d93
Oakely, D.
2bf19f25-1c44-4491-885e-6c8d75db30d9
Pascal, R.W.
3b2e2a38-334f-430f-b110-253a0a835a07
1997
Josey, S.A.
2252ab7f-5cd2-49fd-a951-aece44553d93
Oakely, D.
2bf19f25-1c44-4491-885e-6c8d75db30d9
Pascal, R.W.
3b2e2a38-334f-430f-b110-253a0a835a07
Josey, S.A., Oakely, D. and Pascal, R.W.
(1997)
On estimating the atmospheric longwave flux at the ocean surface from ship meteorological reports.
Journal of Geophysical Research, 102 (C13), .
(doi:10.1029/97JC02420).
Abstract
The accuracy to which the atmospheric component of the longwave flux at the ocean surface can be estimated by using simple empirical formulae, with information from standard ship meteorological reports as input, has been tested by comparison with radiometric measurements made on cruises in the midlatitude North Atlantic and the Southern Ocean. Over a wide range of atmospheric conditions the best agreement between the estimated and measured downwelling longwave flux is obtained by using the formula of Clark et al. [1974], which has a mean bias error with respect to our combined data set of ?0.7 W/m2. Two other formulae were considered: the Bunker [1976] formula, which is found to overestimate the atmospheric longwave flux at values less than about 350 W/m2, resulting in an overall bias of 9.4 W/m2, and the Bignami et al. [1995] formula, which underestimates the flux over the entire range considered, giving a bias of ?26.5W/m2. The difference in performance of the Clark and Bunker formulae is ascribed to the different parameterizations assumed for the effect of clouds and atmospheric humidity on the longwave flux. It is suggested that the Clark formula be used in future climatological studies at midlatitudes.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Submitted date: October 1996
Published date: 1997
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 157015
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/157015
ISSN: 0148-0227
PURE UUID: 50b7fff3-5687-4566-b988-7a13a32e9a6a
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 14 Jun 2010 10:13
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 01:45
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
S.A. Josey
Author:
D. Oakely
Author:
R.W. Pascal
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics