The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Clinical significance of seeding dispersal in biofilms: a response

Stoodley, P., Purevdorj-Gage, B. and Costerton, J.W. (2005) Clinical significance of seeding dispersal in biofilms: a response Microbiology, 151, (11), p.3453. (doi:10.1099/mic.0.28456-0).

Record type: Article

Abstract

We welcome the dialogue concerning the potential clinical significance of seeding dispersal (Purevdorj-Gage et al., 2005) in the life cycle of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. We had based our hypothesis that the seeding dispersal phenomenon may be more relevant for non-mucoid, environmental strains on (1) the propensity of diseases associated with reduced mucociliary clearance in the lung, such as cystic fibrosis (CF) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), to select for mucoid P. aeruginosa phenotypes, and (2) that conversion to mucoidy is usually associated with a concomitant down-regulation of flagella production and loss of swimming motility (see Garrett et al., 1999). However, as Kirov et al. discuss above, there may be greater diversity in mucoid CF isolates than generally acknowledged, and the perceived dichotomy between mucoidy and swimming phenotypes should be a topic for debate. More recently it has been shown that expression of flagellum genes in response to oxygen limitation precedes loss of mucoidy and is reversible during this state of transition (Wyckoff et al., 2002). Further, in an ongoing screen of mucoid CF isolates it was found that 6 out of 20 were motile (D.J. Wozniak, personal communication). However, it was suspected that growth medium may also play a role in the outcome of the motility assay and exact proportions may vary depending on culture conditions. The growth-condition-dependent transient switching between mucoid and swimming phenotypes is problematic when relating a particular biofilm behaviour with phenotype and stresses the importance of attempting to characterize the phenotypic state at various time points during biofilm development. Broadly though, the finding of Dr Wozniak is in agreement with that of Kirov et al. We agree that to fully assess the role of seeding dispersal (and other yet unidentified behavioural developmental phenotypes) in the context of lung infections, biofilm studies should include greater diversity in strains, growth conditions and be conducted over longer time scales. The interesting observation that seeding motility occurred in a mucoid CF isolate clearly demonstrates that the phenomenon may have clinical relevance.

Another point we would like to briefly address is the difference in terminology used by our two groups in reference to the hollowing out of clusters. Kirov et al. refer to hollowing resulting from ‘bacteriophage-mediated lysis' as ‘death-associated dispersal’. We use the term ‘seeding dispersal’ in a more general sense to describe sequential steps from the formation of microcolonies culminating in the release of live cells from the centres of the colonies. Our working hypothesis for seeding dispersal which integrates observations from our two groups is thus: (1) the formation of cell clusters; (2) the differentiation of the cell cluster into two or possibly three distinct phenotypes consisting of the cells in the stationary cluster ‘wall’, the highly motile seeding subpopulation in the interior and the lysing interior subpopulation (Webb et al., 2003) which allows the interior to liquefy; (3) highly agitated ‘seeding motility’ in the interior; and finally (4) the swimming, or swarming, of cells out of the microcolony. In the case of PAO1 the release appears to occur through directed motility, but we recognize that hollowing in non-motile species such as Staphylococcus epidermidis (P. Stewart & B. Pitts, personal communication) and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans (Kaplan et al., 2003) may be driven by water currents. It is interesting to speculate that the recent increase in reports of hollow clusters occurring in a diversity of bacterial biofilms is evidence of convergent evolution in biofilm development.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 2005
Organisations: Engineering Mats & Surface Engineerg Gp

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 158299
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/158299
ISSN: 1350-0872
PURE UUID: 99cb0e0c-1127-427e-b5aa-bca4a9a16ebd

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Jun 2010 13:47
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 12:39

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: P. Stoodley
Author: B. Purevdorj-Gage
Author: J.W. Costerton

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×