The ability of peripheral quantitative ultrasound to identify patients with low bone mineral density in the hip or spine
The ability of peripheral quantitative ultrasound to identify patients with low bone mineral density in the hip or spine
This study aims to assess the sensitivity and specificity of two commercially available quantitative ultrasound (QUS) scanners (CUBA Clinical™, Sunlight Omnisense™), to differentiate patients with osteoporosis (OP) or osteopenia at the spine and hip confirmed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and to investigate the optimum cut-off values to maximize the effectiveness of the screening technique. Participants (n = 268) received DXA scans on their lumbar spine (L1-L4) and hip, with paired QUS scans on their distal radius, proximal phalanx, midshaft tibia and calcaneus. Scanners were evaluated by using receiver-operating characteristics curves and their area under the curve (AUC) values. Measurement of the calcaneus by the CUBA Clinical™ showed a superior ability to predict DXA, with AUC values between 0.75 to 0.83 in comparison with AUC values of 0.60 to 0.70 for the Sunlight Omnisense™. Cut-off values varied according to the technique used and the accuracy of the screening required. Assessment of the calcaneus was the best QUS technique for the prediction of low bone density at the axial skeleton as diagnosed by DXA
osteoporosis, screening, specificity, sensitivity, dxa, ultrasound scanners
625-632
Cook, R.B.
06f8322d-81be-4f82-9326-19e55541c78f
Collins, D.
2b66fd7b-6461-4290-87b0-54fe8fe7e4b6
Tucker, J.
124febb6-dc7f-4dab-b425-ff3e85c81593
Zioupos, P.
11b6158a-2969-43b4-b19b-a01b00ee65fa
May 2005
Cook, R.B.
06f8322d-81be-4f82-9326-19e55541c78f
Collins, D.
2b66fd7b-6461-4290-87b0-54fe8fe7e4b6
Tucker, J.
124febb6-dc7f-4dab-b425-ff3e85c81593
Zioupos, P.
11b6158a-2969-43b4-b19b-a01b00ee65fa
Cook, R.B., Collins, D., Tucker, J. and Zioupos, P.
(2005)
The ability of peripheral quantitative ultrasound to identify patients with low bone mineral density in the hip or spine.
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 31 (5), .
(doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.02.003).
Abstract
This study aims to assess the sensitivity and specificity of two commercially available quantitative ultrasound (QUS) scanners (CUBA Clinical™, Sunlight Omnisense™), to differentiate patients with osteoporosis (OP) or osteopenia at the spine and hip confirmed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and to investigate the optimum cut-off values to maximize the effectiveness of the screening technique. Participants (n = 268) received DXA scans on their lumbar spine (L1-L4) and hip, with paired QUS scans on their distal radius, proximal phalanx, midshaft tibia and calcaneus. Scanners were evaluated by using receiver-operating characteristics curves and their area under the curve (AUC) values. Measurement of the calcaneus by the CUBA Clinical™ showed a superior ability to predict DXA, with AUC values between 0.75 to 0.83 in comparison with AUC values of 0.60 to 0.70 for the Sunlight Omnisense™. Cut-off values varied according to the technique used and the accuracy of the screening required. Assessment of the calcaneus was the best QUS technique for the prediction of low bone density at the axial skeleton as diagnosed by DXA
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 3 February 2005
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 April 2005
Published date: May 2005
Keywords:
osteoporosis, screening, specificity, sensitivity, dxa, ultrasound scanners
Organisations:
nCATS Group
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 158549
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/158549
ISSN: 0301-5629
PURE UUID: 969ec291-0854-46c1-ae1c-3123aab98c99
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Jan 2015 11:00
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:55
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
D. Collins
Author:
J. Tucker
Author:
P. Zioupos
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics