The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The structure of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in four cohorts of community-based, healthy older people: the HALCyon program

The structure of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in four cohorts of community-based, healthy older people: the HALCyon program
The structure of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in four cohorts of community-based, healthy older people: the HALCyon program
Background: The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is widely used but evaluation of its psychometric properties has produced equivocal results. Little is known about its structure in non-clinical samples of older people.

Methods: We used data from four cohorts in the HALCyon collaborative research program into healthy aging: the Caerphilly Prospective Study, the Hertfordshire Ageing Study, the Hertfordshire Cohort Study, and the Lothian Birth Cohort 1921. We used exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis with multi-group comparisons to establish the structure of the HADS and test for factorial invariance between samples.

Results: Exploratory factor analysis showed a bi-dimensional structure (anxiety and depression) of the scale in men and women in each cohort. We tested a hypothesized three-factor model but high correlations between two of the factors made a two-factor model more psychologically plausible. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the sizes of the respective item loadings on the two factors were effectively identical in men and women from the same cohort. There was more variation between cohorts, particularly those from different parts of the U.K. and in whom the HADS was administered differently. Differences in social-class distribution accounted for part of this variation.

Conclusions: Scoring the HADS as two subscales of anxiety and depression is appropriate in non-clinical populations of older men and women. However, there were differences between cohorts in the way that individual items were linked with the constructs of anxiety and depression, perhaps due to differences in sociocultural factors and/or in the administration of the scale.

psychometric properties, rating scales, factor analysis
1041-6102
559-571
Gale, Catherine R.
5bb2abb3-7b53-42d6-8aa7-817e193140c8
Allerhand, Michael
9007afe3-8320-4dc7-9889-6230c3fedac5
Sayer, Avan Aihie
fb4c2053-6d51-4fc1-9489-c3cb431b0ffb
Cooper, Cyrus
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Dennison, Elaine M.
ee647287-edb4-4392-8361-e59fd505b1d1
Starr, John M.
92fc6cf8-b0f7-47dc-93d8-8fd246d40585
Ben-Shlomo, Yoav
df80bd02-a908-4296-b293-825d42203729
Gallacher, John E.
e05d736b-eb13-4f6b-b8ca-6f417d60a6a7
Kuh, Diana
4f3b51aa-21a0-4d68-be14-e1ed75448aaf
Deary, Ian J.
027158ae-fbfb-40ea-98b1-32d2690499ac
Gale, Catherine R.
5bb2abb3-7b53-42d6-8aa7-817e193140c8
Allerhand, Michael
9007afe3-8320-4dc7-9889-6230c3fedac5
Sayer, Avan Aihie
fb4c2053-6d51-4fc1-9489-c3cb431b0ffb
Cooper, Cyrus
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Dennison, Elaine M.
ee647287-edb4-4392-8361-e59fd505b1d1
Starr, John M.
92fc6cf8-b0f7-47dc-93d8-8fd246d40585
Ben-Shlomo, Yoav
df80bd02-a908-4296-b293-825d42203729
Gallacher, John E.
e05d736b-eb13-4f6b-b8ca-6f417d60a6a7
Kuh, Diana
4f3b51aa-21a0-4d68-be14-e1ed75448aaf
Deary, Ian J.
027158ae-fbfb-40ea-98b1-32d2690499ac

Gale, Catherine R., Allerhand, Michael, Sayer, Avan Aihie, Cooper, Cyrus, Dennison, Elaine M., Starr, John M., Ben-Shlomo, Yoav, Gallacher, John E., Kuh, Diana and Deary, Ian J. (2010) The structure of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in four cohorts of community-based, healthy older people: the HALCyon program. International Psychogeriatrics, 22 (4), 559-571. (doi:10.1017/S1041610210000256).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is widely used but evaluation of its psychometric properties has produced equivocal results. Little is known about its structure in non-clinical samples of older people.

Methods: We used data from four cohorts in the HALCyon collaborative research program into healthy aging: the Caerphilly Prospective Study, the Hertfordshire Ageing Study, the Hertfordshire Cohort Study, and the Lothian Birth Cohort 1921. We used exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis with multi-group comparisons to establish the structure of the HADS and test for factorial invariance between samples.

Results: Exploratory factor analysis showed a bi-dimensional structure (anxiety and depression) of the scale in men and women in each cohort. We tested a hypothesized three-factor model but high correlations between two of the factors made a two-factor model more psychologically plausible. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the sizes of the respective item loadings on the two factors were effectively identical in men and women from the same cohort. There was more variation between cohorts, particularly those from different parts of the U.K. and in whom the HADS was administered differently. Differences in social-class distribution accounted for part of this variation.

Conclusions: Scoring the HADS as two subscales of anxiety and depression is appropriate in non-clinical populations of older men and women. However, there were differences between cohorts in the way that individual items were linked with the constructs of anxiety and depression, perhaps due to differences in sociocultural factors and/or in the administration of the scale.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 10 March 2010
Keywords: psychometric properties, rating scales, factor analysis

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 158975
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/158975
ISSN: 1041-6102
PURE UUID: 897f5971-2b6d-4646-b5c7-da0a138cc921
ORCID for Catherine R. Gale: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3361-8638
ORCID for Cyrus Cooper: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-0709
ORCID for Elaine M. Dennison: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3048-4961

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Jun 2010 08:40
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 02:45

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Michael Allerhand
Author: Avan Aihie Sayer
Author: Cyrus Cooper ORCID iD
Author: John M. Starr
Author: Yoav Ben-Shlomo
Author: John E. Gallacher
Author: Diana Kuh
Author: Ian J. Deary

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×