How can accelerated development of bioenergy contribute to the future UK energy mix? Insights from a MARKAL modelling exercise
How can accelerated development of bioenergy contribute to the future UK energy mix? Insights from a MARKAL modelling exercise
Background: this work explores the potential contribution of bioenergy technologies to 60% and 80% carbon reductions in the UK energy system by 2050, by outlining the potential for accelerated technological development of bioenergy chains. The investigation was based on insights from MARKAL modelling, detailed literature reviews and expert consultations. Due to the number and complexity of bioenergy pathways and technologies in the model, three chains and two underpinning technologies were selected for detailed investigation: (1) lignocellulosic hydrolysis for the production of bioethanol, (2) gasification technologies for heat and power, (3) fast pyrolysis of biomass for bio-oil production, (4) biotechnological advances for second generation bioenergy crops, and (5) the development of agro-machinery for growing and harvesting bioenergy crops. Detailed literature searches and expert consultations (looking inter alia at research and development needs and economic projections) led to the development of an 'accelerated' dataset of modelling parameters for each of the selected bioenergy pathways, which were included in five different scenario runs with UK-MARKAL (MED). The results of the 'accelerated runs' were compared with a low-carbon (LC-Core) scenario, which assesses the cheapest way to decarbonise the energy sector.
Results: bioenergy was deployed in larger quantities in the bioenergy accelerated technological development scenario compared with the LC-Core scenario. In the electricity sector, solid biomass was highly utilised for energy crop gasification, displacing some deployment of wind power, and nuclear and marine to a lesser extent. Solid biomass was also deployed for heat in the residential sector from 2040 in much higher quantities in the bioenergy accelerated technological development scenario compared with LC-Core. Although lignocellulosic ethanol increased, overall ethanol decreased in the transport sector in the bioenergy accelerated technological development scenario due to a reduction in ethanol produced from wheat.
Conclusion: there is much potential for future deployment of bioenergy technologies to decarbonise the energy sector. However, future deployment is dependent on many different factors including investment and efforts towards research and development needs, carbon reduction targets and the ability to compete with other low carbon technologies as they become deployed. All bioenergy technologies should become increasingly more economically competitive with fossil-based technologies as feedstock costs and flexibility are reduced in line with technological advances
13-[19pp]
Clarke, Donna
f5db577c-32e8-400f-8b1c-c7adf8b00e91
Jablonski, Sophie
f80191f9-cc08-4e8e-a997-5ee3337208aa
Moran, Brighid
7c9dcbd2-2461-4d01-b8b5-07aad1d84d69
Anandarajah, Gabrial
3952188e-b765-4b62-a957-00919020dac7
July 2009
Clarke, Donna
f5db577c-32e8-400f-8b1c-c7adf8b00e91
Jablonski, Sophie
f80191f9-cc08-4e8e-a997-5ee3337208aa
Moran, Brighid
7c9dcbd2-2461-4d01-b8b5-07aad1d84d69
Anandarajah, Gabrial
3952188e-b765-4b62-a957-00919020dac7
Clarke, Donna, Jablonski, Sophie, Moran, Brighid, Anandarajah, Gabrial and Taylor, Gail
(2009)
How can accelerated development of bioenergy contribute to the future UK energy mix? Insights from a MARKAL modelling exercise.
Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2 (1), .
(doi:10.1186/1754-6834-2-13).
Abstract
Background: this work explores the potential contribution of bioenergy technologies to 60% and 80% carbon reductions in the UK energy system by 2050, by outlining the potential for accelerated technological development of bioenergy chains. The investigation was based on insights from MARKAL modelling, detailed literature reviews and expert consultations. Due to the number and complexity of bioenergy pathways and technologies in the model, three chains and two underpinning technologies were selected for detailed investigation: (1) lignocellulosic hydrolysis for the production of bioethanol, (2) gasification technologies for heat and power, (3) fast pyrolysis of biomass for bio-oil production, (4) biotechnological advances for second generation bioenergy crops, and (5) the development of agro-machinery for growing and harvesting bioenergy crops. Detailed literature searches and expert consultations (looking inter alia at research and development needs and economic projections) led to the development of an 'accelerated' dataset of modelling parameters for each of the selected bioenergy pathways, which were included in five different scenario runs with UK-MARKAL (MED). The results of the 'accelerated runs' were compared with a low-carbon (LC-Core) scenario, which assesses the cheapest way to decarbonise the energy sector.
Results: bioenergy was deployed in larger quantities in the bioenergy accelerated technological development scenario compared with the LC-Core scenario. In the electricity sector, solid biomass was highly utilised for energy crop gasification, displacing some deployment of wind power, and nuclear and marine to a lesser extent. Solid biomass was also deployed for heat in the residential sector from 2040 in much higher quantities in the bioenergy accelerated technological development scenario compared with LC-Core. Although lignocellulosic ethanol increased, overall ethanol decreased in the transport sector in the bioenergy accelerated technological development scenario due to a reduction in ethanol produced from wheat.
Conclusion: there is much potential for future deployment of bioenergy technologies to decarbonise the energy sector. However, future deployment is dependent on many different factors including investment and efforts towards research and development needs, carbon reduction targets and the ability to compete with other low carbon technologies as they become deployed. All bioenergy technologies should become increasingly more economically competitive with fossil-based technologies as feedstock costs and flexibility are reduced in line with technological advances
Text
How_can_accelerated_development_of_bioenergy.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: July 2009
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 160017
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/160017
PURE UUID: df3bf7d7-939e-4bdd-8a8b-52f4b76dfbb9
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Jul 2010 08:17
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 01:56
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Donna Clarke
Author:
Sophie Jablonski
Author:
Brighid Moran
Author:
Gabrial Anandarajah
Author:
Gail Taylor
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics