An investigation into the effect of limiting the frequency bandwidth of speech on speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users
An investigation into the effect of limiting the frequency bandwidth of speech on speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the limited-frequency bandwidth employed by telephones (300-3400 Hz) on speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users. The Four Alternative Auditory Feature (FAAF) test was used in four conditions: unfiltered and in three filtered conditions of 300-4500 Hz, 300-3400 Hz and 300-2500 Hz. Ten subjects implanted with the Nucleus CI24M device and 10 normal-hearing listeners were assessed to examine differences between word discrimination scores in each condition. Scores obtained from the 300-3400-Hz and 300-2500-Hz filtered conditions were significantly worse than those with unfiltered speech for the cochlear implant subjects, decreasing by 17.7% and 21.4%, respectively, from scores with unfiltered speech. By contrast, the normal-hearing listeners did not experience difficulties in discriminating between words in any of the conditions. Analysis of the word errors demonstrated that the reduction in implant subject scores with bandwidth arose from errors in place of articulation. Filtering speech in this way has a significant effect on speech recognition for cochlear implant subjects but not normal-hearing listeners. Hence, the limitations of the normal telephone bandwidth can be expected to have a negative effect on speech recognition for cochlear implant users using the telephone.
356-362
Milchard, Abigail J.
7a1b2e5e-b6a7-4395-bcb3-83bc841d352d
Cullington, Helen E.
a8b72e6d-2788-406d-aefe-d7f34ee6e10e
June 2004
Milchard, Abigail J.
7a1b2e5e-b6a7-4395-bcb3-83bc841d352d
Cullington, Helen E.
a8b72e6d-2788-406d-aefe-d7f34ee6e10e
Milchard, Abigail J. and Cullington, Helen E.
(2004)
An investigation into the effect of limiting the frequency bandwidth of speech on speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users.
International Journal of Audiology, 43 (6), .
(doi:10.1080/14992020400050045).
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the limited-frequency bandwidth employed by telephones (300-3400 Hz) on speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users. The Four Alternative Auditory Feature (FAAF) test was used in four conditions: unfiltered and in three filtered conditions of 300-4500 Hz, 300-3400 Hz and 300-2500 Hz. Ten subjects implanted with the Nucleus CI24M device and 10 normal-hearing listeners were assessed to examine differences between word discrimination scores in each condition. Scores obtained from the 300-3400-Hz and 300-2500-Hz filtered conditions were significantly worse than those with unfiltered speech for the cochlear implant subjects, decreasing by 17.7% and 21.4%, respectively, from scores with unfiltered speech. By contrast, the normal-hearing listeners did not experience difficulties in discriminating between words in any of the conditions. Analysis of the word errors demonstrated that the reduction in implant subject scores with bandwidth arose from errors in place of articulation. Filtering speech in this way has a significant effect on speech recognition for cochlear implant subjects but not normal-hearing listeners. Hence, the limitations of the normal telephone bandwidth can be expected to have a negative effect on speech recognition for cochlear implant users using the telephone.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: June 2004
Organisations:
Human Sciences Group
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 161723
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/161723
PURE UUID: 78cb814d-58fe-4911-a455-a53c63cf66b8
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Aug 2010 14:00
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:53
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Abigail J. Milchard
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics