The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Comparison of the risk of drowsiness and sedation between Levocetirizine and Desloratadine: a prescription-event monitoring study in England

Layton, Deborah, Wilton, Lynda, Boshier, Andrew, Cornelius, Victoria, Harris, Scott and Shakir, Saad A.W. (2006) Comparison of the risk of drowsiness and sedation between Levocetirizine and Desloratadine: a prescription-event monitoring study in England Drug Safety, 29, (10), pp. 897-909.

Record type: Article


Background and objectives: Desloratadine and levocetirizine are histamine H1 receptor antagonists (antihistamines) that were launched in the UK in 2001. Our objective was to compare the frequency with which drowsiness and sedation were reported for desloratadine and levocetirizine within the first 30 days of observation, as monitored using the observational cohort technique of prescription-event monitoring (PEM).

Methods: Exposure data were derived from dispensed prescriptions written by primary care physicians and outcome data were derived from questionnaires that were posted to prescribers at least 6 months after the date of the first prescription for each patient. The odds ratio (OR) was calculated using unconditional logistic regression modelling. The effect of age, sex, reported prescribing indication (allergic rhinitis with asthma/wheezing, allergic rhinitis without asthma/wheezing, 'other'), pattern of use and reported previous antihistamine use on the OR was examined. A time-to-event analysis was performed.

Results: The cohorts comprised >24 000 patients in total. Cohort demographics were similar (both cohorts: median age 37 years; 60% women); the most frequently reported prescribing indication for both drugs was allergic rhinitis without asthma/wheezing (54%). The incidence of first reports of drowsiness/sedation for levocetirizine or desloratadine was low (46 [0.37%] and 9 [0.08%], respectively) and statistically different (p < 0.0001). These events tended to occur earlier for desloratadine than levocetirizine (50% at 7 or 14 days of observation, respectively; p = 0.6487), but the cumulative time to event differed, with more events observed for levocetirizine than expected (p < 0.0001; 46 vs 28.09). The final estimates of risk were the sex-adjusted ORs for each prescribing indication category: allergic rhinitis with asthma/wheezing (3.51; 95% CI 0.71, 17.43; n = 3357), allergic rhinitis without asthma/wheezing (6.75; 95% CI 2.37, 19.22; n = 12 627) and 'other' (3.11; 95% CI 0.86, 11.31; n = 6725).

Discussion: Although the reporting rates of drowsiness and sedation are low for both drugs, patients prescribed levocetirizine are more likely to experience drowsiness and sedation in the first month of observation (after starting treatment) than patients prescribed desloratadine. For patients with allergic rhinitis without asthma/wheezing, the sex-adjusted odds of drowsiness/sedation were over six times greater in patients using levocetirizine than desloratadine in the first month of observation, with the OR being statistically significant. For the other two indication categories, allergic rhinitis with asthma/wheezing and 'other', the OR was not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Although the risk of drowsiness/sedation is low, conditions such as allergic rhinitis are common, which makes any impact on patient cognitive function important. Doctors should be aware of this when prescribing these products to patients where daytime sedation is undesirable. However, essential components of the comparative benefit-risk evaluation of these two products include assessment of efficacy and patient preference (neither of which forms part of this study).

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 2006


Local EPrints ID: 162317
ISSN: 0114-5916
PURE UUID: 20ede3ed-40d6-4c15-b38f-4088aa4d7eca

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Aug 2010 12:37
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 12:32

Export record


Author: Deborah Layton
Author: Lynda Wilton
Author: Andrew Boshier
Author: Victoria Cornelius
Author: Scott Harris
Author: Saad A.W. Shakir

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton:

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.