Deriving confidence in paleointensity estimates
Deriving confidence in paleointensity estimates
Determining the strength of the ancient geomagnetic field (paleointensity) can be time consuming and can result in high data rejection rates. The current paleointensity database is therefore dominated by studies that contain only a small number of paleomagnetic samples (n). It is desirable to estimate how many samples are required to obtain a reliable estimate of the true paleointensity and the uncertainty associated with that estimate. Assuming that real paleointensity data are normally distributed, an assumption adopted by most workers when they employ the arithmetic mean and standard deviation to characterize their data, we can use distribution theory to address this question. Our calculations indicate that if we wish to have 95% confidence that an estimated mean falls within a ±10% interval about the true mean, as many as 24 paleomagnetic samples are required. This is an unfeasibly high number for typical paleointensity studies. Given that most paleointensity studies have small n, this requires that we have adequately defined confidence intervals around estimated means. We demonstrate that the estimated standard deviation is a poor method for defining confidence intervals for n < 7. Instead, the standard error should be used to provide a 95% confidence interval, thus facilitating consistent comparison between data sets of different sizes. The estimated standard deviation, however, should retain its role as a data selection criterion because it is a measure of the fidelity of a paleomagnetic recorder. However, to ensure consistent confidence levels, within-site consistency criteria must be depend on n. Defining such a criterion using the 95% confidence level results in the rejection of ?56% of all currently available paleointensity data entries.
Q07Z18
Paterson, Greig A.
af24fc9c-0679-4abc-8aed-b8b00326f82a
Heslop, David
f32aae36-7f51-40e1-bf7d-54a561369a8d
Muxworthy, Adrian R.
7fa5c819-b5ca-4354-83df-f9481b16ed1e
2010
Paterson, Greig A.
af24fc9c-0679-4abc-8aed-b8b00326f82a
Heslop, David
f32aae36-7f51-40e1-bf7d-54a561369a8d
Muxworthy, Adrian R.
7fa5c819-b5ca-4354-83df-f9481b16ed1e
Paterson, Greig A., Heslop, David and Muxworthy, Adrian R.
(2010)
Deriving confidence in paleointensity estimates.
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 11, .
(doi:10.1029/2010GC003071).
Abstract
Determining the strength of the ancient geomagnetic field (paleointensity) can be time consuming and can result in high data rejection rates. The current paleointensity database is therefore dominated by studies that contain only a small number of paleomagnetic samples (n). It is desirable to estimate how many samples are required to obtain a reliable estimate of the true paleointensity and the uncertainty associated with that estimate. Assuming that real paleointensity data are normally distributed, an assumption adopted by most workers when they employ the arithmetic mean and standard deviation to characterize their data, we can use distribution theory to address this question. Our calculations indicate that if we wish to have 95% confidence that an estimated mean falls within a ±10% interval about the true mean, as many as 24 paleomagnetic samples are required. This is an unfeasibly high number for typical paleointensity studies. Given that most paleointensity studies have small n, this requires that we have adequately defined confidence intervals around estimated means. We demonstrate that the estimated standard deviation is a poor method for defining confidence intervals for n < 7. Instead, the standard error should be used to provide a 95% confidence interval, thus facilitating consistent comparison between data sets of different sizes. The estimated standard deviation, however, should retain its role as a data selection criterion because it is a measure of the fidelity of a paleomagnetic recorder. However, to ensure consistent confidence levels, within-site consistency criteria must be depend on n. Defining such a criterion using the 95% confidence level results in the rejection of ?56% of all currently available paleointensity data entries.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2010
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 162433
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/162433
ISSN: 1525-2027
PURE UUID: 34daa96f-8570-4b58-bd1a-922a59ab1466
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Aug 2010 09:19
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:02
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Greig A. Paterson
Author:
David Heslop
Author:
Adrian R. Muxworthy
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics