The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Fitting log-linear models to contingency tables from surveys with complex sampling designs: an investigation of the clogg-eliason approach

Fitting log-linear models to contingency tables from surveys with complex sampling designs: an investigation of the clogg-eliason approach
Fitting log-linear models to contingency tables from surveys with complex sampling designs: an investigation of the clogg-eliason approach
Clogg and Eliason (1987) proposed a simple method for taking account of survey weights when fitting log-linear models to contingency tables. This article investigates the properties of this method. A rationale is provided for the method when the weights are constant within the cells of the table. For more general cases, however, it is shown that the standard errors produced by the method are invalid, contrary to claims in the literature.

The method is compared to the pseudo maximum likelihood method both theoretically and through an empirical study of social mobility relating daughter’s class to father’s class using survey data from France. The method of Clogg and Eliason is found to underestimate standard errors systematically. The article concludes by recommending against the use of this method, despite its simplicity. The limitations of the method may be overcome by using the pseudo maximum likelihood method.
complex sampling jackknife, log linear model, pseudo maximum likelihood, stratification, survey weight
0049-1241
83-108
Skinner, Chris
dec5ef40-49ef-492a-8a1d-eb8c6315b8ce
Vallet, Louis-Andre
36310782-3d25-44ae-90df-f4c59546f743
Skinner, Chris
dec5ef40-49ef-492a-8a1d-eb8c6315b8ce
Vallet, Louis-Andre
36310782-3d25-44ae-90df-f4c59546f743

Skinner, Chris and Vallet, Louis-Andre (2010) Fitting log-linear models to contingency tables from surveys with complex sampling designs: an investigation of the clogg-eliason approach. Sociological Methods and Research, 39 (1), 83-108. (doi:10.1177/0049124110366239).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Clogg and Eliason (1987) proposed a simple method for taking account of survey weights when fitting log-linear models to contingency tables. This article investigates the properties of this method. A rationale is provided for the method when the weights are constant within the cells of the table. For more general cases, however, it is shown that the standard errors produced by the method are invalid, contrary to claims in the literature.

The method is compared to the pseudo maximum likelihood method both theoretically and through an empirical study of social mobility relating daughter’s class to father’s class using survey data from France. The method of Clogg and Eliason is found to underestimate standard errors systematically. The article concludes by recommending against the use of this method, despite its simplicity. The limitations of the method may be overcome by using the pseudo maximum likelihood method.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: August 2010
Keywords: complex sampling jackknife, log linear model, pseudo maximum likelihood, stratification, survey weight

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 163087
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/163087
ISSN: 0049-1241
PURE UUID: 3122c221-6112-4280-be36-82557c3ecc39

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Sep 2010 08:21
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:04

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Chris Skinner
Author: Louis-Andre Vallet

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×