A comprehensive, multi-process box-model approach to glacial-interglacial carbon cycling
A comprehensive, multi-process box-model approach to glacial-interglacial carbon cycling
The canonical question of which physical, chemical or biological mechanisms were responsible for oceanic uptake of atmospheric CO2 during the last glacial is yet unanswered. Insight from paleo proxies has led to a multitude of hypotheses but none so far have been convincingly supported in three dimensional numerical modelling experiments. The processes that influence the CO2 uptake and export production are inter-related and too complex to solve conceptually while complex numerical models are time consuming and expensive to run which severely limits the combinations of mechanisms that can be explored. Instead, an intermediate inverse box model approach is used here in which the whole parameter space is explored. The glacial circulation and biological production states are derived from these using proxies of glacial export production and the need to draw down CO2 into the ocean. We find that circulation patterns which explain glacial observations include reduced Antarctic Bottom Water formation and high latitude mixing and to a lesser extent reduced equatorial upwelling. The proposed mechanism of CO2 uptake by an increase of eddies in the Southern Ocean, leading to a reduced residual circulation, is not supported. Regarding biological mechanisms, an increase in the nutrient utilization in either the equatorial regions or the northern polar latitudes can reduce atmospheric CO2 and satisfy proxies of glacial export production. Consistent with previous studies, CO2 is drawn down more easily through increased productivity in the Antarctic region than the sub-Antarctic, but that violates observations of lower export production there.
867-903
de Boer, A.M.
52c8d657-0b6b-4d1b-8e02-98b77b4ffc92
Watson, A.J.
22b78032-6022-4ed3-bea8-d1bfefcf599c
Edwards, N.R.
e41b719b-784e-4748-acc4-6ccbc4643c7d
Oliver, Kevin I.C.
588b11c6-4d0c-4c59-94e2-255688474987
2010
de Boer, A.M.
52c8d657-0b6b-4d1b-8e02-98b77b4ffc92
Watson, A.J.
22b78032-6022-4ed3-bea8-d1bfefcf599c
Edwards, N.R.
e41b719b-784e-4748-acc4-6ccbc4643c7d
Oliver, Kevin I.C.
588b11c6-4d0c-4c59-94e2-255688474987
de Boer, A.M., Watson, A.J., Edwards, N.R. and Oliver, Kevin I.C.
(2010)
A comprehensive, multi-process box-model approach to glacial-interglacial carbon cycling.
Climate of the Past, 6, .
(doi:10.5194/cpd-6-867-2010).
Abstract
The canonical question of which physical, chemical or biological mechanisms were responsible for oceanic uptake of atmospheric CO2 during the last glacial is yet unanswered. Insight from paleo proxies has led to a multitude of hypotheses but none so far have been convincingly supported in three dimensional numerical modelling experiments. The processes that influence the CO2 uptake and export production are inter-related and too complex to solve conceptually while complex numerical models are time consuming and expensive to run which severely limits the combinations of mechanisms that can be explored. Instead, an intermediate inverse box model approach is used here in which the whole parameter space is explored. The glacial circulation and biological production states are derived from these using proxies of glacial export production and the need to draw down CO2 into the ocean. We find that circulation patterns which explain glacial observations include reduced Antarctic Bottom Water formation and high latitude mixing and to a lesser extent reduced equatorial upwelling. The proposed mechanism of CO2 uptake by an increase of eddies in the Southern Ocean, leading to a reduced residual circulation, is not supported. Regarding biological mechanisms, an increase in the nutrient utilization in either the equatorial regions or the northern polar latitudes can reduce atmospheric CO2 and satisfy proxies of glacial export production. Consistent with previous studies, CO2 is drawn down more easily through increased productivity in the Antarctic region than the sub-Antarctic, but that violates observations of lower export production there.
Text
deboer_10_cp_carbonbox.pdf
- Other
More information
Published date: 2010
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 163299
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/163299
ISSN: 1814-9332
PURE UUID: e2599c5a-bef1-486c-8413-fd461490afdb
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 14 Sep 2010 13:43
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:04
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
A.M. de Boer
Author:
A.J. Watson
Author:
N.R. Edwards
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics