When protocols fail: technical evaluation, biomedical knowledge, and the social production of 'facts' about a telemedicine clinic
When protocols fail: technical evaluation, biomedical knowledge, and the social production of 'facts' about a telemedicine clinic
Telecommunications systems seem to offer health care providers, professionals and patients a plethora of opportunities to respond to social and geographical inequalities in health care provision, and a new field of health care endeavor has emerged — ‘telemedicine’. This paper presents results from a three year ethnographic study of the development and implementation of telemedicine systems in a British region. We explore how attempts to put into service one ‘telemedicine’ system failed to get beyond the draft of a written protocol. Our analysis focuses on the contests between clinicians, technical experts and external evaluators over what kinds of knowledge and practice count in developing a protocol and evaluating a clinical intervention. We show how the introduction and implementation of ‘hard’ technologies (systems hardware) can be undermined in practice by ‘soft’ technologies (the practices through which evaluative knowledge is produced).
telemedicine, social construction, medical knowledge, evaluation, uk
989-1002
May, Carl
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Ellis, Nicola T.
5440bfed-93d5-4ed3-bde5-3d036085ee93
October 2001
May, Carl
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Ellis, Nicola T.
5440bfed-93d5-4ed3-bde5-3d036085ee93
May, Carl and Ellis, Nicola T.
(2001)
When protocols fail: technical evaluation, biomedical knowledge, and the social production of 'facts' about a telemedicine clinic.
Social Science & Medicine, 53 (8), .
(doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00394-4).
Abstract
Telecommunications systems seem to offer health care providers, professionals and patients a plethora of opportunities to respond to social and geographical inequalities in health care provision, and a new field of health care endeavor has emerged — ‘telemedicine’. This paper presents results from a three year ethnographic study of the development and implementation of telemedicine systems in a British region. We explore how attempts to put into service one ‘telemedicine’ system failed to get beyond the draft of a written protocol. Our analysis focuses on the contests between clinicians, technical experts and external evaluators over what kinds of knowledge and practice count in developing a protocol and evaluating a clinical intervention. We show how the introduction and implementation of ‘hard’ technologies (systems hardware) can be undermined in practice by ‘soft’ technologies (the practices through which evaluative knowledge is produced).
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: October 2001
Keywords:
telemedicine, social construction, medical knowledge, evaluation, uk
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 163429
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/163429
ISSN: 0277-9536
PURE UUID: 5b5648b7-7082-431a-b685-912fe5854cd9
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Sep 2010 08:55
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:04
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Carl May
Author:
Nicola T. Ellis
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics