Qualitative research and the problem of judgement: lessons from interviewing fellow professionals
Qualitative research and the problem of judgement: lessons from interviewing fellow professionals
Background: Qualitative research methods are recognized increasingly as valuable tools for primary care research, and add an extra dimension to quantitative work.
Objective. The aim of this study was to illustrate the benefits and problems attending the dual role of clinician/qualitative researcher.
Methods: As part of two studies employing semi-structured interviews of GPs in a North-West conurbation, about the topics of consultations on chronic low back pain and drug misuse in primary care, respondents' views on their interaction with a GP researcher were explored.
Results: Access to the GP by the interviewing GP was easier when the GP researcher was known to the respondent. Such prior knowledge, however, may then influence the content of the data and the manner in which the GP researcher is perceived. During the interview itself, where respondents recognized the researcher as a clinician, interviews were broader in scope and provided richer and more personal accounts of attitudes and behaviour in clinical practice. The GP was also identified as an expert and judge, not just of clinical decision making but also about moral judgements made by GPs in their work. This will impact on the data obtained at interview and must be taken into consideration when the data are interpreted and analysed.
Conclusion: Qualitative research techniques increasingly are advocated as appropriate for research on and in general practice. The professional identity of the researcher plays an important part in constructing the kind of data obtained in such studies, and this must be made apparent in reporting and discussions of such qualitative work.
general practice research, interviewing, qualitative research
285-289
Chew-Graham, Carolyn A.
28f3f383-6b7f-492f-9ffa-8422d7239c9c
May, Carl
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Perry, M.
687e4467-3d09-4979-8232-c0298b3ead91
2 November 2002
Chew-Graham, Carolyn A.
28f3f383-6b7f-492f-9ffa-8422d7239c9c
May, Carl
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Perry, M.
687e4467-3d09-4979-8232-c0298b3ead91
Chew-Graham, Carolyn A., May, Carl and Perry, M.
(2002)
Qualitative research and the problem of judgement: lessons from interviewing fellow professionals.
Family Practice, 19 (3), .
(doi:10.1093/fampra/19.3.285).
Abstract
Background: Qualitative research methods are recognized increasingly as valuable tools for primary care research, and add an extra dimension to quantitative work.
Objective. The aim of this study was to illustrate the benefits and problems attending the dual role of clinician/qualitative researcher.
Methods: As part of two studies employing semi-structured interviews of GPs in a North-West conurbation, about the topics of consultations on chronic low back pain and drug misuse in primary care, respondents' views on their interaction with a GP researcher were explored.
Results: Access to the GP by the interviewing GP was easier when the GP researcher was known to the respondent. Such prior knowledge, however, may then influence the content of the data and the manner in which the GP researcher is perceived. During the interview itself, where respondents recognized the researcher as a clinician, interviews were broader in scope and provided richer and more personal accounts of attitudes and behaviour in clinical practice. The GP was also identified as an expert and judge, not just of clinical decision making but also about moral judgements made by GPs in their work. This will impact on the data obtained at interview and must be taken into consideration when the data are interpreted and analysed.
Conclusion: Qualitative research techniques increasingly are advocated as appropriate for research on and in general practice. The professional identity of the researcher plays an important part in constructing the kind of data obtained in such studies, and this must be made apparent in reporting and discussions of such qualitative work.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2 November 2002
Keywords:
general practice research, interviewing, qualitative research
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 163455
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/163455
ISSN: 0263-2136
PURE UUID: 12b5a8f3-da05-4d5c-950a-6310d04a5de6
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 08 Sep 2010 15:09
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:05
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Carolyn A. Chew-Graham
Author:
Carl May
Author:
M. Perry
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics