The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Qualitative research and the problem of judgement: lessons from interviewing fellow professionals

Record type: Article

Background: Qualitative research methods are recognized increasingly as valuable tools for primary care research, and add an extra dimension to quantitative work.
Objective. The aim of this study was to illustrate the benefits and problems attending the dual role of clinician/qualitative researcher.

Methods: As part of two studies employing semi-structured interviews of GPs in a North-West conurbation, about the topics of consultations on chronic low back pain and drug misuse in primary care, respondents' views on their interaction with a GP researcher were explored.

Results: Access to the GP by the interviewing GP was easier when the GP researcher was known to the respondent. Such prior knowledge, however, may then influence the content of the data and the manner in which the GP researcher is perceived. During the interview itself, where respondents recognized the researcher as a clinician, interviews were broader in scope and provided richer and more personal accounts of attitudes and behaviour in clinical practice. The GP was also identified as an expert and judge, not just of clinical decision making but also about moral judgements made by GPs in their work. This will impact on the data obtained at interview and must be taken into consideration when the data are interpreted and analysed.

Conclusion: Qualitative research techniques increasingly are advocated as appropriate for research on and in general practice. The professional identity of the researcher plays an important part in constructing the kind of data obtained in such studies, and this must be made apparent in reporting and discussions of such qualitative work.

Full text not available from this repository.

Citation

Chew-Graham, Carolyn A., May, Carl and Perry, M. (2002) Qualitative research and the problem of judgement: lessons from interviewing fellow professionals Family Practice, 19, (3), pp. 285-289. (doi:10.1093/fampra/19.3.285).

More information

Published date: 2 November 2002
Keywords: general practice research, interviewing, qualitative research

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 163455
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/163455
ISSN: 0263-2136
PURE UUID: 12b5a8f3-da05-4d5c-950a-6310d04a5de6
ORCID for Carl May: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0451-2690

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Sep 2010 15:09
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 12:31

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Carolyn A. Chew-Graham
Author: Carl May ORCID iD
Author: M. Perry

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×