Normative models of health technology assessment and the social production of evidence about telehealth care
Normative models of health technology assessment and the social production of evidence about telehealth care
Telehealthcare is a rapidly growing field of clinical activity and technical development. These new technologies have caught the attention of clinicians and policy makers because they seem to offer more rapid access to specialist care, and the potential to solve structural problems around inequalities of service provision and distribution. However, as a field of clinical practice, telehealthcare has consistently been criticised because of the poor quality of the clinical and technical evidence that its proponents have marshalled. The problem of ‘evidence’ is not a local one. In this paper, we undertake two tasks: first, we critically contrast the normative expectations of the wider field of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) with those configured within debates about Telehealthcare Evaluation; and second, we critically review models that provide structures within which the production of evidence about telehealthcare can take place. Our analysis focuses on the political projects configured within a literature aimed at stabilising evaluative knowledge production about telehealthcare in the face of substantial political and methodological problems
evaluation, evidence-base, health technology assessment, R&D policy, social construction, telemedicine, telehealthcare
39-54
Williams, Tracy
deae26a9-0e9c-43e5-bba8-5f6e7a072a76
May, Carl
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Mair, Frances
5a57846b-cda7-4368-9d20-0aa2a1d490ca
Mort, Maggie
d4ca7be5-46e0-4708-a380-35f14ea54c72
Gask, Linda
9805a757-54f2-400c-b3f4-b5cc277df509
April 2003
Williams, Tracy
deae26a9-0e9c-43e5-bba8-5f6e7a072a76
May, Carl
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Mair, Frances
5a57846b-cda7-4368-9d20-0aa2a1d490ca
Mort, Maggie
d4ca7be5-46e0-4708-a380-35f14ea54c72
Gask, Linda
9805a757-54f2-400c-b3f4-b5cc277df509
Williams, Tracy, May, Carl, Mair, Frances, Mort, Maggie and Gask, Linda
(2003)
Normative models of health technology assessment and the social production of evidence about telehealth care.
Health Policy, 64 (1), .
(doi:10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00179-3).
Abstract
Telehealthcare is a rapidly growing field of clinical activity and technical development. These new technologies have caught the attention of clinicians and policy makers because they seem to offer more rapid access to specialist care, and the potential to solve structural problems around inequalities of service provision and distribution. However, as a field of clinical practice, telehealthcare has consistently been criticised because of the poor quality of the clinical and technical evidence that its proponents have marshalled. The problem of ‘evidence’ is not a local one. In this paper, we undertake two tasks: first, we critically contrast the normative expectations of the wider field of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) with those configured within debates about Telehealthcare Evaluation; and second, we critically review models that provide structures within which the production of evidence about telehealthcare can take place. Our analysis focuses on the political projects configured within a literature aimed at stabilising evaluative knowledge production about telehealthcare in the face of substantial political and methodological problems
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: April 2003
Keywords:
evaluation, evidence-base, health technology assessment, R&D policy, social construction, telemedicine, telehealthcare
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 163465
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/163465
PURE UUID: ec1de488-e0fb-4597-b4ec-95227c2c933d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Sep 2010 07:28
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:05
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Tracy Williams
Author:
Carl May
Author:
Frances Mair
Author:
Maggie Mort
Author:
Linda Gask
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics