Understanding the normalization of telemedicine services through qualitative evaluation
Understanding the normalization of telemedicine services through qualitative evaluation
Objective: qualitative studies can help us understand the “successes” and “failures” of telemedicine to normalize within clinical service provision. This report presents the development of a robust conceptual model of normalization processes in the implementation and development of telemedicine services.
Design: retrospective and cumulative analysis of longitudinal qualitative data from three studies was undertaken between 1997 and 2002. Observation and semistructured interviews produced a substantial body of data relating to approximately 582 discrete data collection episodes. Data were analyzed separately in each of three studies. Cumulative analysis was conducted by constant comparison.
Results:(1) Implementation of telemedicine services depends on a positive link with a (local or national) policy level sponsor. (2) Adoption of telemedicine systems in service depends on successful structural integration so that development of organizational structures takes place. (3) Translation of telemedicine technologies into clinical practice depends on the enrollment of cohesive, cooperative groups. (4) Stabilization of telemedicine systems in practice depends on integration at the level of professional knowledge and practice, where clinicians are able to accommodate telemedicine through the development of new procedures and protocols.
Conclusion: a rationalized linear diffusion model of “telehealthcare” is inadequate in assessing the potential for normalization, and the political, organizational, and “ownership” problems that govern the process of development, implementation, and normalization need to be accounted for. This report presents a model for assessing the potential for successful implementation of telehealthcare services. This model defines the requirements for the successful normalization of telemedicine systems in clinical practice
596-604
May, Carl
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Harrison, Robert
0b4a1ad7-443c-459e-ab17-6ad481578ef7
Finch, Tracey
eab3eabc-414f-42c4-9dcd-625b33f29e41
Macfarlane, Anne
8d892346-192c-4c83-96d3-d9e7fba43d64
Mair, Frances
5a57846b-cda7-4368-9d20-0aa2a1d490ca
Wallace, Paul
58984a15-50df-4cea-b278-bd973fa4ef48
November 2003
May, Carl
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Harrison, Robert
0b4a1ad7-443c-459e-ab17-6ad481578ef7
Finch, Tracey
eab3eabc-414f-42c4-9dcd-625b33f29e41
Macfarlane, Anne
8d892346-192c-4c83-96d3-d9e7fba43d64
Mair, Frances
5a57846b-cda7-4368-9d20-0aa2a1d490ca
Wallace, Paul
58984a15-50df-4cea-b278-bd973fa4ef48
May, Carl, Harrison, Robert, Finch, Tracey, Macfarlane, Anne, Mair, Frances and Wallace, Paul
(2003)
Understanding the normalization of telemedicine services through qualitative evaluation.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 10 (6), .
(doi:10.1197/jamia.M1145).
Abstract
Objective: qualitative studies can help us understand the “successes” and “failures” of telemedicine to normalize within clinical service provision. This report presents the development of a robust conceptual model of normalization processes in the implementation and development of telemedicine services.
Design: retrospective and cumulative analysis of longitudinal qualitative data from three studies was undertaken between 1997 and 2002. Observation and semistructured interviews produced a substantial body of data relating to approximately 582 discrete data collection episodes. Data were analyzed separately in each of three studies. Cumulative analysis was conducted by constant comparison.
Results:(1) Implementation of telemedicine services depends on a positive link with a (local or national) policy level sponsor. (2) Adoption of telemedicine systems in service depends on successful structural integration so that development of organizational structures takes place. (3) Translation of telemedicine technologies into clinical practice depends on the enrollment of cohesive, cooperative groups. (4) Stabilization of telemedicine systems in practice depends on integration at the level of professional knowledge and practice, where clinicians are able to accommodate telemedicine through the development of new procedures and protocols.
Conclusion: a rationalized linear diffusion model of “telehealthcare” is inadequate in assessing the potential for normalization, and the political, organizational, and “ownership” problems that govern the process of development, implementation, and normalization need to be accounted for. This report presents a model for assessing the potential for successful implementation of telehealthcare services. This model defines the requirements for the successful normalization of telemedicine systems in clinical practice
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: November 2003
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 163495
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/163495
ISSN: 1067-5027
PURE UUID: 591b799b-c5d8-4ceb-8e1a-1e4c64ec491f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Sep 2010 08:07
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:05
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Carl May
Author:
Robert Harrison
Author:
Tracey Finch
Author:
Anne Macfarlane
Author:
Frances Mair
Author:
Paul Wallace
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics