Patients or research subjects? A qualitative study of participation in a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention
Patients or research subjects? A qualitative study of participation in a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention
Objective: to explore participants’ understandings regarding treatment decisions, made within an efficacy randomised controlled trial (RCT) of decision-support tools.
Methods: qualitative study: interviews (audio-recorded) with participants. Participants were interviewed 3–5 days after using a decision-support tool (n = 30) and again at 3 months (n = 26). Transcripts were analysed using a constant comparative approach.
Results: participants’ understandings were shaped by the ways in which they made sense of their participation. Participants made attributions about their trial identity that fell on a continuum. At one end we found participants who identified as ‘experienced medical volunteers’, and at the other those who identified as ‘real patients’. In the participants’ accounts, a trial identity of ‘patient’ accompanied an expectation that the decision-support tools offered a means of making treatment decisions. ‘Volunteers’, however, saw the interventions as tasks to be completed for the purposes of the trial team.
Conclusion: in our study, trial identity shaped participants’ understandings regarding treatment decisions and all other aspects of the trial.
Practice implications: different understandings regarding the appropriate response to trial tasks may affect behaviour and therefore outcomes in some trials. Further research is required to unravel the relationship between trial identities, understanding and behaviour
participation, RCT, complex intervention, qualitative research, identity, behaviour, chronic illness
260-270
Heaven, Ben
c1450e21-13bc-467f-98b4-6c6f233139c1
Murtagh, Madeleine
25c1b33b-78f0-47f7-be84-e60ac5a41cfc
Rapley, Tim
eb4364d5-c016-403a-969a-aae1fd35a97c
May, Carl
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Graham, Ruth
51cb25c6-246e-4e22-811c-c5d3cf89cebf
Kaner, Eileen
dd32baba-7237-4a2c-ae71-9c411af36ff2
Thomson, Richard
e9f815c0-7122-4fdc-9bd7-f867139e614f
August 2006
Heaven, Ben
c1450e21-13bc-467f-98b4-6c6f233139c1
Murtagh, Madeleine
25c1b33b-78f0-47f7-be84-e60ac5a41cfc
Rapley, Tim
eb4364d5-c016-403a-969a-aae1fd35a97c
May, Carl
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Graham, Ruth
51cb25c6-246e-4e22-811c-c5d3cf89cebf
Kaner, Eileen
dd32baba-7237-4a2c-ae71-9c411af36ff2
Thomson, Richard
e9f815c0-7122-4fdc-9bd7-f867139e614f
Heaven, Ben, Murtagh, Madeleine, Rapley, Tim, May, Carl, Graham, Ruth, Kaner, Eileen and Thomson, Richard
(2006)
Patients or research subjects? A qualitative study of participation in a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention.
Patient Education and Counselling, 62 (2), .
(doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.07.013).
Abstract
Objective: to explore participants’ understandings regarding treatment decisions, made within an efficacy randomised controlled trial (RCT) of decision-support tools.
Methods: qualitative study: interviews (audio-recorded) with participants. Participants were interviewed 3–5 days after using a decision-support tool (n = 30) and again at 3 months (n = 26). Transcripts were analysed using a constant comparative approach.
Results: participants’ understandings were shaped by the ways in which they made sense of their participation. Participants made attributions about their trial identity that fell on a continuum. At one end we found participants who identified as ‘experienced medical volunteers’, and at the other those who identified as ‘real patients’. In the participants’ accounts, a trial identity of ‘patient’ accompanied an expectation that the decision-support tools offered a means of making treatment decisions. ‘Volunteers’, however, saw the interventions as tasks to be completed for the purposes of the trial team.
Conclusion: in our study, trial identity shaped participants’ understandings regarding treatment decisions and all other aspects of the trial.
Practice implications: different understandings regarding the appropriate response to trial tasks may affect behaviour and therefore outcomes in some trials. Further research is required to unravel the relationship between trial identities, understanding and behaviour
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: August 2006
Keywords:
participation, RCT, complex intervention, qualitative research, identity, behaviour, chronic illness
Organisations:
Health Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 163543
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/163543
ISSN: 0738-3991
PURE UUID: 513d3e28-806e-41df-8522-cd6a3012bf00
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Sep 2010 11:49
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:05
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Ben Heaven
Author:
Madeleine Murtagh
Author:
Tim Rapley
Author:
Carl May
Author:
Ruth Graham
Author:
Eileen Kaner
Author:
Richard Thomson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics