The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Patients or research subjects? A qualitative study of participation in a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention

Patients or research subjects? A qualitative study of participation in a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention
Patients or research subjects? A qualitative study of participation in a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention
Objective: to explore participants’ understandings regarding treatment decisions, made within an efficacy randomised controlled trial (RCT) of decision-support tools.

Methods: qualitative study: interviews (audio-recorded) with participants. Participants were interviewed 3–5 days after using a decision-support tool (n = 30) and again at 3 months (n = 26). Transcripts were analysed using a constant comparative approach.

Results: participants’ understandings were shaped by the ways in which they made sense of their participation. Participants made attributions about their trial identity that fell on a continuum. At one end we found participants who identified as ‘experienced medical volunteers’, and at the other those who identified as ‘real patients’. In the participants’ accounts, a trial identity of ‘patient’ accompanied an expectation that the decision-support tools offered a means of making treatment decisions. ‘Volunteers’, however, saw the interventions as tasks to be completed for the purposes of the trial team.

Conclusion: in our study, trial identity shaped participants’ understandings regarding treatment decisions and all other aspects of the trial.

Practice implications: different understandings regarding the appropriate response to trial tasks may affect behaviour and therefore outcomes in some trials. Further research is required to unravel the relationship between trial identities, understanding and behaviour
participation, RCT, complex intervention, qualitative research, identity, behaviour, chronic illness
0738-3991
260-270
Heaven, Ben
c1450e21-13bc-467f-98b4-6c6f233139c1
Murtagh, Madeleine
25c1b33b-78f0-47f7-be84-e60ac5a41cfc
Rapley, Tim
eb4364d5-c016-403a-969a-aae1fd35a97c
May, Carl
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Graham, Ruth
51cb25c6-246e-4e22-811c-c5d3cf89cebf
Kaner, Eileen
dd32baba-7237-4a2c-ae71-9c411af36ff2
Thomson, Richard
e9f815c0-7122-4fdc-9bd7-f867139e614f
Heaven, Ben
c1450e21-13bc-467f-98b4-6c6f233139c1
Murtagh, Madeleine
25c1b33b-78f0-47f7-be84-e60ac5a41cfc
Rapley, Tim
eb4364d5-c016-403a-969a-aae1fd35a97c
May, Carl
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Graham, Ruth
51cb25c6-246e-4e22-811c-c5d3cf89cebf
Kaner, Eileen
dd32baba-7237-4a2c-ae71-9c411af36ff2
Thomson, Richard
e9f815c0-7122-4fdc-9bd7-f867139e614f

Heaven, Ben, Murtagh, Madeleine, Rapley, Tim, May, Carl, Graham, Ruth, Kaner, Eileen and Thomson, Richard (2006) Patients or research subjects? A qualitative study of participation in a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention. Patient Education and Counselling, 62 (2), 260-270. (doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.07.013).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: to explore participants’ understandings regarding treatment decisions, made within an efficacy randomised controlled trial (RCT) of decision-support tools.

Methods: qualitative study: interviews (audio-recorded) with participants. Participants were interviewed 3–5 days after using a decision-support tool (n = 30) and again at 3 months (n = 26). Transcripts were analysed using a constant comparative approach.

Results: participants’ understandings were shaped by the ways in which they made sense of their participation. Participants made attributions about their trial identity that fell on a continuum. At one end we found participants who identified as ‘experienced medical volunteers’, and at the other those who identified as ‘real patients’. In the participants’ accounts, a trial identity of ‘patient’ accompanied an expectation that the decision-support tools offered a means of making treatment decisions. ‘Volunteers’, however, saw the interventions as tasks to be completed for the purposes of the trial team.

Conclusion: in our study, trial identity shaped participants’ understandings regarding treatment decisions and all other aspects of the trial.

Practice implications: different understandings regarding the appropriate response to trial tasks may affect behaviour and therefore outcomes in some trials. Further research is required to unravel the relationship between trial identities, understanding and behaviour

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: August 2006
Keywords: participation, RCT, complex intervention, qualitative research, identity, behaviour, chronic illness
Organisations: Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 163543
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/163543
ISSN: 0738-3991
PURE UUID: 513d3e28-806e-41df-8522-cd6a3012bf00
ORCID for Carl May: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0451-2690

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Sep 2010 11:49
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:05

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ben Heaven
Author: Madeleine Murtagh
Author: Tim Rapley
Author: Carl May ORCID iD
Author: Ruth Graham
Author: Eileen Kaner
Author: Richard Thomson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×