Integrating service development with evaluation in telehealthcare: an ethnographic study
Integrating service development with evaluation in telehealthcare: an ethnographic study
Objectives: to identify issues that facilitate the successful integration of evaluation and development of telehealthcare services.
Design: ethnographic study using various qualitative research techniques to obtain data from several sources, including in-depth semistructured interviews, project steering group meetings, and public telehealthcare meetings.
Setting: seven telehealthcare evaluation projects (four randomised controlled trials and three pragmatic service evaluations) in the United Kingdom, studied over two years. Projects spanned a range of specialties—dermatology, psychiatry, respiratory medicine, cardiology, and oncology.
Participants: clinicians, managers, technical experts, and researchers involved in the projects.
Results and discussion: key problems in successfully integrating evaluation and service development in telehealthcare are, firstly, defining existing clinical practices (and anticipating changes) in ways that permit measurement; secondly, managing additional workload and conflicting responsibilities brought about by combining clinical and research responsibilities (including managing risk); and, thirdly, understanding various perspectives on effectiveness and the limitations of evaluation results beyond the context of the research study.
Conclusions: combined implementation and evaluation of telehealthcare systems is complex, and is often underestimated. The distinction between quantitative outcomes and the workability of the system is important for producing evaluative knowledge that is of practical value. More pragmatic approaches to evaluation, that permit both quantitative and qualitative methods, are required to improve the quality of such research and its relevance for service provision in the NHS
1205-1208
Finch, Tracy
b1916307-8516-4b70-8ba5-05d3310839de
May, Carl
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Mair, Frances
5a57846b-cda7-4368-9d20-0aa2a1d490ca
Mort, Maggie
d4ca7be5-46e0-4708-a380-35f14ea54c72
Gask, Linda
9805a757-54f2-400c-b3f4-b5cc277df509
November 2003
Finch, Tracy
b1916307-8516-4b70-8ba5-05d3310839de
May, Carl
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Mair, Frances
5a57846b-cda7-4368-9d20-0aa2a1d490ca
Mort, Maggie
d4ca7be5-46e0-4708-a380-35f14ea54c72
Gask, Linda
9805a757-54f2-400c-b3f4-b5cc277df509
Finch, Tracy, May, Carl, Mair, Frances, Mort, Maggie and Gask, Linda
(2003)
Integrating service development with evaluation in telehealthcare: an ethnographic study.
BMJ, 327 (7425), .
(doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1205).
Abstract
Objectives: to identify issues that facilitate the successful integration of evaluation and development of telehealthcare services.
Design: ethnographic study using various qualitative research techniques to obtain data from several sources, including in-depth semistructured interviews, project steering group meetings, and public telehealthcare meetings.
Setting: seven telehealthcare evaluation projects (four randomised controlled trials and three pragmatic service evaluations) in the United Kingdom, studied over two years. Projects spanned a range of specialties—dermatology, psychiatry, respiratory medicine, cardiology, and oncology.
Participants: clinicians, managers, technical experts, and researchers involved in the projects.
Results and discussion: key problems in successfully integrating evaluation and service development in telehealthcare are, firstly, defining existing clinical practices (and anticipating changes) in ways that permit measurement; secondly, managing additional workload and conflicting responsibilities brought about by combining clinical and research responsibilities (including managing risk); and, thirdly, understanding various perspectives on effectiveness and the limitations of evaluation results beyond the context of the research study.
Conclusions: combined implementation and evaluation of telehealthcare systems is complex, and is often underestimated. The distinction between quantitative outcomes and the workability of the system is important for producing evaluative knowledge that is of practical value. More pragmatic approaches to evaluation, that permit both quantitative and qualitative methods, are required to improve the quality of such research and its relevance for service provision in the NHS
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: November 2003
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 163599
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/163599
ISSN: 0959-8138
PURE UUID: 131d87da-d15f-4e52-9e47-995b77e3b3c6
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Sep 2010 13:14
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:06
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Tracy Finch
Author:
Carl May
Author:
Frances Mair
Author:
Maggie Mort
Author:
Linda Gask
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics