The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Integrating service development with evaluation in telehealthcare: an ethnographic study

Integrating service development with evaluation in telehealthcare: an ethnographic study
Integrating service development with evaluation in telehealthcare: an ethnographic study
Objectives: to identify issues that facilitate the successful integration of evaluation and development of telehealthcare services.

Design: ethnographic study using various qualitative research techniques to obtain data from several sources, including in-depth semistructured interviews, project steering group meetings, and public telehealthcare meetings.

Setting: seven telehealthcare evaluation projects (four randomised controlled trials and three pragmatic service evaluations) in the United Kingdom, studied over two years. Projects spanned a range of specialties—dermatology, psychiatry, respiratory medicine, cardiology, and oncology.

Participants: clinicians, managers, technical experts, and researchers involved in the projects.

Results and discussion: key problems in successfully integrating evaluation and service development in telehealthcare are, firstly, defining existing clinical practices (and anticipating changes) in ways that permit measurement; secondly, managing additional workload and conflicting responsibilities brought about by combining clinical and research responsibilities (including managing risk); and, thirdly, understanding various perspectives on effectiveness and the limitations of evaluation results beyond the context of the research study.

Conclusions: combined implementation and evaluation of telehealthcare systems is complex, and is often underestimated. The distinction between quantitative outcomes and the workability of the system is important for producing evaluative knowledge that is of practical value. More pragmatic approaches to evaluation, that permit both quantitative and qualitative methods, are required to improve the quality of such research and its relevance for service provision in the NHS
0959-8138
1205-1208
Finch, Tracy
b1916307-8516-4b70-8ba5-05d3310839de
May, Carl
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Mair, Frances
5a57846b-cda7-4368-9d20-0aa2a1d490ca
Mort, Maggie
d4ca7be5-46e0-4708-a380-35f14ea54c72
Gask, Linda
9805a757-54f2-400c-b3f4-b5cc277df509
Finch, Tracy
b1916307-8516-4b70-8ba5-05d3310839de
May, Carl
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Mair, Frances
5a57846b-cda7-4368-9d20-0aa2a1d490ca
Mort, Maggie
d4ca7be5-46e0-4708-a380-35f14ea54c72
Gask, Linda
9805a757-54f2-400c-b3f4-b5cc277df509

Finch, Tracy, May, Carl, Mair, Frances, Mort, Maggie and Gask, Linda (2003) Integrating service development with evaluation in telehealthcare: an ethnographic study. BMJ, 327 (7425), 1205-1208. (doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1205).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: to identify issues that facilitate the successful integration of evaluation and development of telehealthcare services.

Design: ethnographic study using various qualitative research techniques to obtain data from several sources, including in-depth semistructured interviews, project steering group meetings, and public telehealthcare meetings.

Setting: seven telehealthcare evaluation projects (four randomised controlled trials and three pragmatic service evaluations) in the United Kingdom, studied over two years. Projects spanned a range of specialties—dermatology, psychiatry, respiratory medicine, cardiology, and oncology.

Participants: clinicians, managers, technical experts, and researchers involved in the projects.

Results and discussion: key problems in successfully integrating evaluation and service development in telehealthcare are, firstly, defining existing clinical practices (and anticipating changes) in ways that permit measurement; secondly, managing additional workload and conflicting responsibilities brought about by combining clinical and research responsibilities (including managing risk); and, thirdly, understanding various perspectives on effectiveness and the limitations of evaluation results beyond the context of the research study.

Conclusions: combined implementation and evaluation of telehealthcare systems is complex, and is often underestimated. The distinction between quantitative outcomes and the workability of the system is important for producing evaluative knowledge that is of practical value. More pragmatic approaches to evaluation, that permit both quantitative and qualitative methods, are required to improve the quality of such research and its relevance for service provision in the NHS

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: November 2003

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 163599
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/163599
ISSN: 0959-8138
PURE UUID: 131d87da-d15f-4e52-9e47-995b77e3b3c6
ORCID for Carl May: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0451-2690

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Sep 2010 13:14
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:06

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Tracy Finch
Author: Carl May ORCID iD
Author: Frances Mair
Author: Maggie Mort
Author: Linda Gask

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×